Testosterone Nation
SEARCH

Advanced | Members

HOME    T-NATION FORUMS    TMUSCLE STORE     LOG IN
TMUSCLE Store
Metabolic Drive

Alpha Cell Roundtable #1 - Back
Rating
1 2 3 4 | Next Last
 

MODOK
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2029

Lets convene the first installment of the alpha cell roundtable. A thread designed for the members to bounce ideas and concepts from their own training and personal experiences off of one another, bring out subtle tricks that you have learned, exercises you love, and anything else that you'd like to throw out there about the topic.

This month, lets turn things on its head and visit a bodypart thats completely irrelevant to the chest and bis friday evening pump crowd, and also a calling card for only the truly serious, big, stong mf'ers...the back.

I'll admit, when I was 16 years old and just starting out, I didn't even know I HAD a back. Pulldowns were about the extent of it. As I gained knowledge and understood that my body did in fact have a posterior, I devoted quite a bit of time bringing it back in line with the rest of everything else. Now I enjoy back training probably more than anything else, oddly enough.


At least in my training, heavy rows have always been the money exercise. Hammer strength iso rows were GREAT when I had access, and moreso now than ever before HEAVY DB rows. For some reason, the DB row is far superior for me to the bb row. I just never got much out of them, even though I did them for YEARS. Another thing I've never felt has actually given me any GROWTH...pulldowns of any variety. Sure, I do them/did them with every variation and loaded every different way, but they just never seemed to put any beef on me. Pullups are a little better, but in all honesty my width and thickness on the back have come from rows. Neutral pullups are effective as well, but I have to load them pretty heavy to feel anything. Chins? Nah...I just can't feel them in my lats too much no matter how I try them.

Deadlifts. I know a whole lot of folks do these on back day, but I've always done them with legs as a hamstring exercise. That said, they blast the shit out of my back, and not just the erectors...the lats too. I'm more and more seeing them as just an isometric row with heavy ass weight. In my opinion, you've got to have some sort of deadlift in there if you want your back to be as thick as possible.

So who's next? Lets hear some experiences, experiments, etc. and talk a little training.

Report Post
 

bugeishaAD
Level 4

Join date: Aug 2007
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 1189

I'm not advanced or anything, but in my own experience and in my limited experience helping others, I firmly believe the biggest factor in getting your back to grow is to create a strong mind-muscle connection. Without it, you may get to the point where you're rowing some heavy weight, or doing pulldowns with the stack, but if you aren't really using your back, you're really short-changing your results, IMHO.

That said, I'm with you on exercise selection. Barbell rows are easily my favorite back exercise. I take as narrow of a grip as I comfortably can, and really squeeze the shit out of my scapulae and all that mid-back, trap, lat musculature mumbo-jumbo. I try and get a good stretch, and on heavy sets, I see nothing wrong with some body english to help get that weight movin.

Dumbell rows are also definitely awesome. Done for higher reps in the Matt Kroc style seems to be very popular too.

I don't deadlift from the floor, but I am sure to plenty of deads off the rack for hopefully the same effect without fatiguing the hamstrings. Doing the movement with a shrug-like movement at the end couldn't hurt the traps either.

Pullups I think are good too, but like I said earlier, the key is learning how to actually USE your back. I did pullups for months before I really started lifting and I think that's the reason why my back is arguably my best bodypart.

I do pulldowns and stuff too, but like MODOK, I dunno how much I've really gotten out of them. This summer, I spent some time trying out the HS machines while I had access to them and loved them as well (High Row was nice for width, and the Iso Low Row felt great for like a DB row substitute).

An experiment that was introduced to me by a training partner this summer was doing standing lat pulldowns. I dunno if this is a novel idea or not, but basically, we'd just wedge our knees or feet against the seat (depends on the machine) and do pulldowns that way, really focusing on a strong contraction. Done as a dropset finisher-type movement, these were great. First time we did these, I'd never experienced such soreness in my back.

Report Post
 

LankyMofo
Level 1

Join date: Nov 2007
Location:
Posts: 3693

I have to say I agree on the heavy DB rows working much better than BB rows.

That being said, I'll talk a little about calves. After my leg training, calves were usually an afterthought and I had trouble forcing myself to train them. Lately (since around April) I've started training them first on leg day. This may not seem groundbreaking because I know a lot of DC guys do this, but for whatever reason, if I've trained them first on leg day, I have a strong desire to train them AGAIN after my other leg exercises. So for awhile now I've been training calves first and last and for the first time I'm actually seeing some improvement.

Report Post
 

DoubleDuce
Level 4

Join date: Jul 2008
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 3503

My favorite upper back exercise:
The Plate Stack Row
MOVEMENT TYPE: Pull
PHILIPPI'S TAKE: "Learning to get position on a stone is one of those things that takes practice, and there's no substitute for a perfectly spherical object that wants to roll out of your arms. This modified version is a full-body movement and is designed to help with the pulling portion of the lift."

EXECUTION: Start with a stack of 45-pound plates (you determine the weight you want to lift, but at least three plates are required for this exercise to mimic the real thing). Place the stack of 45s on a 10-pound plate so your fingers can get underneath. Straddle the stack with your feet just outside the plates and your toes in line with the plate holes. With your knees slightly bent, grasp the stack with your fingers underneath and your palms against the sides. Pull the plates to your chest as if you were doing a bent-over row.


I've found that my back does great with a really high frequency approach. I'll do one upper body pull exercise every workout.

Report Post
 

LankyMofo
Level 1

Join date: Nov 2007
Location:
Posts: 3693

FTR, I tried to edit my post when I realized this thread was all about the back, although I think the original title was edited. ;)

I honestly don't think almost 2 years of pulldowns yielded any results. For anyone out there who claims they are the same as pull ups or rack chins, you're crazy.

Report Post
 

MODOK
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2029

DoubleDuce wrote:
My favorite upper back exercise:
The Plate Stack Row
MOVEMENT TYPE: Pull
PHILIPPI'S TAKE: "Learning to get position on a stone is one of those things that takes practice, and there's no substitute for a perfectly spherical object that wants to roll out of your arms. This modified version is a full-body movement and is designed to help with the pulling portion of the lift."
EXECUTION: Start with a stack of 45-pound plates (you determine the weight you want to lift, but at least three plates are required for this exercise to mimic the real thing). Place the stack of 45s on a 10-pound plate so your fingers can get underneath. Straddle the stack with your feet just outside the plates and your toes in line with the plate holes. With your knees slightly bent, grasp the stack with your fingers underneath and your palms against the sides. Pull the plates to your chest as if you were doing a bent-over row.





Wow, thats interesting. You have to have some pretty damn big hands to get strong on that lift, huh. Do you think its more akin to a bb row than anything else? What kind of contraction/pump do you feel in the lats?

Report Post
 

Jacked Diesel
Level 1

Join date: Jul 2007
Location: South Carolina, USA
Posts: 836

Rack pulls
Heavy DB Rows
Rack chins

Report Post
 

DoubleDuce
Level 4

Join date: Jul 2008
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 3503

MODOK wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
My favorite upper back exercise:
The Plate Stack Row
MOVEMENT TYPE: Pull
PHILIPPI'S TAKE: "Learning to get position on a stone is one of those things that takes practice, and there's no substitute for a perfectly spherical object that wants to roll out of your arms. This modified version is a full-body movement and is designed to help with the pulling portion of the lift."
EXECUTION: Start with a stack of 45-pound plates (you determine the weight you want to lift, but at least three plates are required for this exercise to mimic the real thing). Place the stack of 45s on a 10-pound plate so your fingers can get underneath. Straddle the stack with your feet just outside the plates and your toes in line with the plate holes. With your knees slightly bent, grasp the stack with your fingers underneath and your palms against the sides. Pull the plates to your chest as if you were doing a bent-over row.





Wow, thats interesting. You have to have some pretty damn big hands to get strong on that lift, huh. Do you think its more akin to a bb row than anything else? What kind of contraction/pump do you feel in the lats?


Grip difficulty depends on the plates and orientation. Itâ??s a lot different that a BB row because you hands are in a narrow, neutral grip.

You can move a lot of weight, the only problem being you start reducing ROM when the stack gets higher.

Only one way to know how it feels for your back, try it out.

Report Post
 

Hanley
Level 0

Join date: Jun 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 5687

Not much to add other than - Pendlay Rows. If you've never done em, you're missing out.

These kill my entire back like nothing else... They literally cover EVERTHING. Your lower back gets a good workout stabilising the weight and your lats and upper back get hammered too. They're one of those exercises that once it goes up, everything follows - deadlift, bench etc...

They're especially useful for shirted benching because they allow you to build really good bench stability in my experience.

High frequency pull ups (3-4x per week) have done a lot for my back width too.

Another new favourite is hypers with the emphasis on arching from the middle back. Even with no weight and high reps it pumps me up like a motherfucker!!

Report Post
 

MODOK
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2029

Rep ranges for optimal growth- discuss.

Report Post
 

Jacked Diesel
Level 1

Join date: Jul 2007
Location: South Carolina, USA
Posts: 836

MODOK wrote:
Rep ranges for optimal growth- discuss.


I usually switch between the 1-3 rep range and the 5-8 rep range depending I the day, I am a big fan of the 1-3 range though.

Report Post
 

Aragorn
Level 4

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 5361

MODOK wrote:

At least in my training, heavy rows have always been the money exercise. Hammer strength iso rows were GREAT when I had access, and moreso now than ever before HEAVY DB rows. For some reason, the DB row is far superior for me to the bb row. I just never got much out of them, even though I did them for YEARS. Another thing I've never felt has actually given me any GROWTH...pulldowns of any variety. Sure, I do them/did them with every variation and loaded every different way, but they just never seemed to put any beef on me. Pullups are a little better, but in all honesty my width and thickness on the back have come from rows. Neutral pullups are effective as well, but I have to load them pretty heavy to feel anything. Chins? Nah...I just can't feel them in my lats too much no matter how I try them.

Deadlifts. I


I'm going to have to agree with you. Haven't read all the responses yet but I'll get to that in a second...fucking love back training!!

This is gonna be all over the place, I have to race to get all my thoughts down before I forget them....

Rows are the money. I don't get too much out of chins alone. I don't really like them either. Honestly, I think heavy dumbbell rows have given me more than any other exercise in terms of back strength and thickness.

I will second you on the barbell row as well. If I didn't deadlift as heavy as I typically do, or do goodmornings, then barbell rows might be a better deal for me than they are. I find they put uncomfortable stress on my already torched low back.

I will second you on the deadlift---this is almost always better to go on leg/hamstring day imo! I think about it this way---the heavy deadlift is such a great lift at recruiting the back that if you do it with any sort of volume it almost counts as a second back workout. Perhaps not alone, but in conjunction with either a) rack pulls or b) good mornings, I feel my back is TIRED.

So if you do that on leg day and use back day for direct hit exercises, then you get a higher frequency each week than concentrating all your exercises on back day.

Deadlifts + GMs give you serious fucking thickness. I would not trade them for the world. Also reverse band deadlifts are great for back overload IMO. Like a rack pull but you get the full range of motion AND you can overload the top.

As far as lat growth goes, I actually get a TON of benefit out of pulldowns, but that is because I can feel them better than chins/pull-ups in the lat and nowhere else. The Hammer Strength Lat machine is the only machine I really really like. Mean stretch and great feeling.

Aragorn's top superset for fucking your lats up and making them grow:

A) Chin-up -- set of 8-10+
B) lat pulldown giant set --- set to a weight you can do about 8-12 times, then drop 20-30 lbs and continue doing As Many Reps As Possible, and drop 4 times minimum. emphasis is on feeling lats, go all the way through the ROM if you can but stop if you feel the biceps pulling more than the lats in the motion---keep the ROM such that your lats feel the most effort!

rest 2-3 minutes, repeat 1-3 times

Example:

Chin-up--8 reps
pulldown -- 180 x 10, 150 x 10, 130 x 8, 110 x 10, 80x12, 60x a bunch, 40 x a bunch

I love this super set!! Can change grips up as you see fit, but get a good stretch on the lats. I usually do this after rows and mid back work.

Another point--the "eagle pulldown" is great for if your grip is failing or if your biceps hurt. I notice very little involvement with biceps on this personally. Interesting angle too.

Another thing on the dumbbell rows is to change the point you row them to--say from mid chest to your hip. Moves the leverage and fries the lats with the lower row point. Also needs lighter weight, but do those for a few weeks and go back to "normal" dumbbell rows and you'll feel a lot stronger.

Report Post
 

Aragorn
Level 4

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 5361

MODOK wrote:
Rep ranges for optimal growth- discuss.


Variety is the spice of life. You need a range of them. I have mixed feelings about it though because I've gotten good results from years of low rep work (5 reps in rows, and 1-5 reps in deadlift/gm/rev. band dl).

My current thinking on it is that the back really, really responds well to variety in rep ranges. There are so many different muscles involved, and so many different angles to hit it from, that you can really hammer the different rep ranges. The two things that hammered this home for me were Kroc Rows and my chin/lat death drop set I posted above :). I saw a boost in results after adding each into my training, where I'd done years of work in the 5-8 range.

For direct back work I like mixing rep ranges-- I'll do a lot of work in the 5-8 range for heavy stuff, but then Kroc rows for all-out sets of 20+ are fucking awesome as well. Also, you can basically think of the chin/pulldwon super set as a very high rep set.

I would not do much in the way of low rep stuff for direct back work (below 5 reps), as I also think you need fatigue as I think that the mind/muscle connection suffers more under these conditions and you need it to target the muscles you want, and you need fatigue to drive growth.

I also believe that the back responds better than most bodyparts to frequency---have you ever seen the back of a chick rower? Bigger backs than a lot of guys from doing 5x a week work. I have to say I'm a believer in frequency in general, because I believe (and can't prove :) ) that as the back is probably one of the most important groups for every day use and is involved in just about every single movement you could ever make, it is evolved to handle a highly repetitive workload.

I mean, that being said you don't have to train it 5 times a week, but if you haven't done frequent back work, try it for a while. And vice versa---try blasting your back for 1 day a week. Variety mates.

For indirect back work like DLs and GMs, I think lower reps work better. I admit that I am biased though :). I think, for me, high rep heavy weight DLs are just too draining to recover from and be productive with direct back work. Also I think GMs done to failure are a very good way to mess yourself up. However, high rep GMs with lighter weight can be used pretty well, they just don't have the same effect the heavy ass loading does.

Report Post
 

MaximusB
Level 4

Join date: Apr 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 5644

MODOK wrote:
Rep ranges for optimal growth- discuss.


I personally like the 8-12 range, along with a brutal stretch of the agonist muscle after each set. This also depends on the exercise selected too.

Report Post
 

jehovasfitness
Level 4

Join date: Jan 2006
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 8537

Rep range- as with most other lifts 6-10 95% of the time, depending on the program.

I'm looking forward to giving Rack Chins a fair shake next time I'm bulking, which may be a while.

I generally stick to lat pulldowns (v-grip), chin-ups, DB Row (always has been a favorite) and HS Hi-Row

T-Bar row (chest supported) makes its way in from time to time as well.

Report Post
 

Chewie
Level 3

Join date: Feb 2006
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 2748

100 Pullups.

I read that in a Dan John article and thought "pfft... I've done 33 before this should be cake". Wrong.

Report Post
 

Short Hoss
Level 0

Join date: Jun 2008
Location:
Posts: 772

I didn't change my routine after consistently (and still) getting comments about my back width from everyone.

Heavy deads, pull-ups, heavy Pulldowns, and heavy DB Rows did it.

Simple.

Report Post
 

Short Hoss
Level 0

Join date: Jun 2008
Location:
Posts: 772

Also, deads I never go over 4.

Pull-ups I stick with 12.

DB Rows I stick with 8-10.

Pulldowns, 6-8.

Report Post
 

BONEZ217
Level 2

Join date: Feb 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4738

MODOK wrote:
Rep ranges for optimal growth- discuss.


Rack pulls I prefer 6-8. I go as high as 10 and as low as 4 depending on the day.

Pulldown movement or pullups I like 10-20 reps.

Rowing I stay in the standard hypertrophy range of 8-12.


I've found that getting a good contraction is the most important part of back training for me. A deep stretch is a close second.

HS pullovers are a new addition to my routine. Can't say how effective they are as of yet but I've gotten some new stretch marks on my upper lats so we'll see in a few months.

Report Post
 

malonetd
Level 3

Join date: May 2004
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 4897

It seems a lot of you guys prefer DB rows over BB rows. I'm the opposite. Nothing gives a pump like hi rep BB rows. And I can feel my lats in BB rows more than any other movement.

Since everybody seems to prefer DB's, maybe I'm doing something wrong. I'd like to hear about how some of you set up and do the movement. Are you putting one knee and one hand on a bench? Or just a supporting hand? Are you using a lot of body english? Where are you pulling to?

Report Post
 

Lonnie123
Level 3

Join date: Jun 2004
Location: California, USA
Posts: 3910

Very interesting seeing many of you guys saying that you get more out of pulldowns than you do out of pull ups. For many years on this site nearly all of the forum posters and authors have been poo-poo'ing the pull down and WAY overselling the pullup... In my opinion at least.

I never really got too much out of pull ups in terms of solid back work myself. I kept them in my routine for a while because of all the advice I got for them, dropping them after a while because I was able to "feel" the work of other exercises much better. I generally consider them a descent "upper body strength" exercise, but I dont consider them a superior back exercise.

Top three would probably be:

- Rack Chins : 15-25 reps
- Rack Pulls : Done for both heavy and moderate weight
- Heavy Row : Again, Heavy and moderate

Report Post
 

josh86
Level 2

Join date: Feb 2007
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2324

Wide-grip flat bar pulldowns

Wide-grip Rack Chins

Heavy DB Rows - done Kroc style (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7jAIdoORxI), I've done 200x10 per side

Oldschool T-bar Rows (done Ronnie style, a bit more upright)

V-grip Cable row

Those have always been my staple exercises for back, and I'd say its definitely been working for me.

Rep range wise I do almost everything around 6-10, sometimes pushing upward of 15 max. I pretty much hate ever going above 15.

I would like to add I fully agree with BugeishaAD about the mind-muscle connection with back. I do not even feel my biceps during back work at all 99% of the time.

Report Post
 

MODOK
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2029

Lonnie123 wrote:
Very interesting seeing many of you guys saying that you get more out of pulldowns than you do out of pull ups. For many years on this site nearly all of the forum posters and authors have been poo-poo'ing the pull down and WAY overselling the pullup... In my opinion at least.

I never really got too much out of pull ups in terms of solid back work myself. I kept them in my routine for a while because of all the advice I got for them, dropping them after a while because I was able to "feel" the work of other exercises much better. I generally consider them a descent "upper body strength" exercise, but I dont consider them a superior back exercise.

Top three would probably be:

- Rack Chins : 15-25 reps
- Rack Pulls : Done for both heavy and moderate weight
- Heavy Row : Again, Heavy and moderate


The only real money vertical pulling exercise for me is a neutral grip pullup with a grip of 12 inches or less between the hands. Wider, I can't feel it in the lats...narrower it dislocates my wrists.

Report Post
 

MODOK
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2029

Who here does legit "kroc rows" in their routine? By legit I mean heavy as possible for > 25 reps set. There is something about them. When you go that heavy and that high of a rep range, you have a very long time under tension. I can feel shit remodeling in my back while I'm doing the set.Connective tissue stretches, the back remodels, and my back is starting to look TOTALLY different structurally than it did before I started them.

Report Post
 

Aragorn
Level 4

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 5361

malonetd wrote:
It seems a lot of you guys prefer DB rows over BB rows. I'm the opposite. Nothing gives a pump like hi rep BB rows. And I can feel my lats in BB rows more than any other movement.

Since everybody seems to prefer DB's, maybe I'm doing something wrong. I'd like to hear about how some of you set up and do the movement. Are you putting one knee and one hand on a bench? Or just a supporting hand? Are you using a lot of body english? Where are you pulling to?


Hey, if you get a bunch of benefit out of the bent row, then by all means keep it. For me it just doesn't help me at heavier weights because my low back is so damned tired from GMs and Deadlifts. I can't stay in proper form long enough to get good work done when my low back is fried. If my back is fresh they can be alright.

I put a knee and a hand on the bench. I do use some body english, but I try to minimize it most of the time. Occasionally when pushing for a PR on the Kroc Rows I will just go all out---it's hard to keep your form getting up to reps 15+, so I don't sweat it as much. Most of the time I try and keep it minimal so I can get a good feel of the motion, but let's face it: you're not going to do them absolutely perfectly strict if you're pushing yourself.

I make sure I get a stretch of the lats at the bottom by letting the db swing out from my body a little, but I don't use the "momentum swing" or anything. I pull to mid chest--not too high so I can avoid the biceps contracting too much at the top. Sometimes I'll do what I said up on my first post and use a lighter dumbbell but pull to the hip--I've found this really fires the lats up, but not as much the mid back.

Report Post
1 2 3 4 5 6 | Next Last
Administrators Online: jasondmath, Mod Phoenix