Testosterone Nation
SEARCH

Advanced | Members

HOME    T-NATION FORUMS    TMUSCLE STORE     LOG IN
TMUSCLE Store
Hot Rox

Ronnie vs Jay or Black vs White
Rating
1 2 | Next Last
 

Nick W.
Level 0

Join date: Apr 2009
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 86

I had talked to a photographer about the race subject in bodybuilding, which provoked me look into it a little... I've read/heard that the commercial side of Bodybuilding is aimed at young, caucaisians, given that is the "majority" of the the large-magazine subscribers (Flex, MD etc.) and we have also heard some Pros say it before.. This is not an issue to me, given I'm white, and a DIEHARD fan of Coleman all day! I was just wondering what everybody else thought about this in terms of it being true or not?


ALSO, not relating to the first question; at their best: Ronnie or Jay? This has nothing to do w. race, I am just curious to see who you all like better as a bodybuilder.

N.

Report Post
 

elusive
Level 4

Join date: Jul 2007
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 2776

Ronnie.

Report Post
 

Sentoguy
Level 2

Join date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 4147

I like Ronnie's training intensity better.

Report Post
 

waylanderxx
Level 3

Join date: Mar 2008
Location:
Posts: 5859

As a whole I just see many more black guys who appear to have bodybuilding genetics, at least aesthetics wise. The round muscle bellies, natural leanness, small waist and wide clavicles. Seems like whites have more potential to be mass monsters. Basically in the gym I see mostly pudgy white guys, and the black guys I see are pretty "ripped" if not necessarily big.

That being said, I'm a Ronnie fan all day.

You can even apply that to this website. Seems like every black guy who posts here has a good physique, the same cannot be said for everyone else. There is also 1 or 2 black guys who are monstrous who lurk over in the steroid forum. Maybe I'm just seeing what I want to see, but that's what I've observed.

Report Post
 

Nick W.
Level 0

Join date: Apr 2009
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 86

waylanderxx wrote:
As a whole I just see many more black guys who appear to have bodybuilding genetics, at least aesthetics wise. The round muscle bellies, natural leanness, small waist and wide clavicles. Seems like whites have more potential to be mass monsters. Basically in the gym I see mostly pudgy white guys, and the black guys I see are pretty "ripped" if not necessarily big.

That being said, I'm a Ronnie fan all day.

You can even apply that to this website. Seems like every black guy who posts here has a good physique, the same cannot be said for everyone else. There is also 1 or 2 black guys who are monstrous who lurk over in the steroid forum. Maybe I'm just seeing what I want to see, but that's what I've observed.


I can see that to a point. Ethnicity does tend to have it's own subjective "shape". Alot of asians are very well proportioned, and width.. Irish tend to have great calves, and alot of thickeness etc. etc. It's not a guideline of course, but can be seen.

Report Post
 

Professor X
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 32015

Most consumer items are aimed at a young white male population when it comes to clothing and pop culture influence. They make up the majority. Hip Hop recording sales are highest among white males.

Before Lee Haney won (and even afterwards as he has stated himself) there seemed to be a visible effort to limit the exposure of blacks in magazines related to bodybuilding. They might have exposure INSIDE the magazines, but were rarely seen on the cover. I remember not seeing Shawn Ray on a cover until nearly the 1990's and he was one of the most stand out competitors at that time.

Things have clearly changed, but you still see evidence of this mindset if you look at how they seem to still be looking for their "blond bomber" in the mags. Wolf comes to mind as someone who received MUCH hype but didn't pan out as some apparently hoped.

As far as genetics, yeah, we've had that discussion before. I agree with waylander, if you look at the serious regular posters on this site, there does seem to be quite a difference in how certain people are developed and even the extremes they can reach.

Report Post
 

mr popular
Level 1

Join date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 1951

waylanderxx wrote:
As a whole I just see many more black guys who appear to have bodybuilding genetics, at least aesthetics wise. The round muscle bellies, natural leanness, small waist and wide clavicles.


I hear this a lot, and I agree that black men typically show better potential for a small waist, lower bodyfat, and bigger arms, but their legs and forearms almost always leave something to be desired in my experience.

It would be like saying that just because Asians tend to be leaner and have big calves, that they have better "bodybuilding genetics". It isn't really accurate.

Has anybody actually noticed any real discrepancies between how well black guys and white guys are able to build their chest, shoulders, back, traps? I haven't.

This also completely ignores the fact that black americans have a 51% higher prevalence of obesity compared to whites. I guess those great bodyfat genetics don't count for much.


You can even apply that to this website. Seems like every black guy who posts here has a good physique, the same cannot be said for everyone else. There is also 1 or 2 black guys who are monstrous who lurk over in the steroid forum. Maybe I'm just seeing what I want to see, but that's what I've observed.


How many lousy white rate-my-physique posters have we had that want to look like Brad Pitt, David Beckham, or don't look up to anyone at all? Probably countless.

How many black guys look up to Brad Pitt? My guess: not a whole lot.

Black guys look up to muscular athletes a hell of a lot more than white guys do. I think this has had a huge cultural impact on the goals and physiques we see today between the two races, and accounts for a lot of the discrepancies that people are trying to label as "genetics".

In the gyms I have been to, I typically see a few muscular black guys who come regularly, and then a bunch of really fat or really skinny black guys that I see once or twice and then they never show up again. Those that aren't into being a hiphop/R&B artist, or being obese, seem to be into athletics (excuse my hugely racist generalization). The same can't be said for white people who probably have an even more atrocious turnover rate in gyms.

Professor X wrote:
Most consumer items are aimed at a young white male population when it comes to clothing and pop culture influence. They make up the majority. Hip Hop recording sales are highest among white males.

Before Lee Haney won (and even afterwards as he has stated himself) there seemed to be a visible effort to limit the exposure of blacks in magazines related to bodybuilding. They might have exposure INSIDE the magazines, but were rarely seen on the cover. I remember not seeing Shawn Ray on a cover until nearly the 1990's and he was one of the most stand out competitors at that time.

Things have clearly changed, but you still see evidence of this mindset if you look at how they seem to still be looking for their "blond bomber" in the mags. Wolf comes to mind as someone who received MUCH hype but didn't pan out as some apparently hoped.

As far as genetics, yeah, we've had that discussion before. I agree with waylander, if you look at the serious regular posters on this site, there does seem to be quite a difference in how certain people are developed and even the extremes they can reach.


Since blacks only represent 13% of the population, it would be common sense that most consumer products are marketed towards whites - as you said. And although this doesn't mean white people are "better", I don't understand why we SHOULDN'T be looking for the new blond bomber, if you were implying it's a bad thing? lol

Personally, as a white man with blond hair, I would love to see a great bodybuilder like that for the same reason hispanic fans love to root for hispanic bodybuilders and why you like Lee Haney so much. Dennis Wolf got a lot of hype because he was awesome and a lot of people can relate to a development with that structure and skin tone. People loved Draper for the same reason.

Report Post
 

Nick W.
Level 0

Join date: Apr 2009
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 86

mr popular wrote:
waylanderxx wrote:
As a whole I just see many more black guys who appear to have bodybuilding genetics, at least aesthetics wise. The round muscle bellies, natural leanness, small waist and wide clavicles.


I hear this a lot, and I agree that black men typically show better potential for a small waist, lower bodyfat, and bigger arms, but their legs and forearms almost always leave something to be desired in my experience.

It would be like saying that just because Asians tend to be leaner and have big calves, that they have better "bodybuilding genetics". It isn't really accurate.

Has anybody actually noticed any real discrepancies between how well black guys and white guys are able to build their chest, shoulders, back, traps? I haven't.

This also completely ignores the fact that black americans have a 51% higher prevalence of obesity compared to whites. I guess those great bodyfat genetics don't count for much.


You can even apply that to this website. Seems like every black guy who posts here has a good physique, the same cannot be said for everyone else. There is also 1 or 2 black guys who are monstrous who lurk over in the steroid forum. Maybe I'm just seeing what I want to see, but that's what I've observed.


How many lousy white rate-my-physique posters have we had that want to look like Brad Pitt, David Beckham, or don't look up to anyone at all? Probably countless.

How many black guys look up to Brad Pitt? My guess: not a whole lot.

Black guys look up to muscular athletes a hell of a lot more than white guys do. I think this has had a huge cultural impact on the goals and physiques we see today between the two races, and accounts for a lot of the discrepancies that people are trying to label as "genetics".

In the gyms I have been to, I typically see a few muscular black guys who come regularly, and then a bunch of really fat or really skinny black guys that I see once or twice and then they never show up again. Those that aren't into being a hiphop/R&B artist, or being obese, seem to be into athletics (excuse my hugely racist generalization). The same can't be said for white people who probably have an even more atrocious turnover rate in gyms.

Professor X wrote:
Most consumer items are aimed at a young white male population when it comes to clothing and pop culture influence. They make up the majority. Hip Hop recording sales are highest among white males.

Before Lee Haney won (and even afterwards as he has stated himself) there seemed to be a visible effort to limit the exposure of blacks in magazines related to bodybuilding. They might have exposure INSIDE the magazines, but were rarely seen on the cover. I remember not seeing Shawn Ray on a cover until nearly the 1990's and he was one of the most stand out competitors at that time.

Things have clearly changed, but you still see evidence of this mindset if you look at how they seem to still be looking for their "blond bomber" in the mags. Wolf comes to mind as someone who received MUCH hype but didn't pan out as some apparently hoped.

As far as genetics, yeah, we've had that discussion before. I agree with waylander, if you look at the serious regular posters on this site, there does seem to be quite a difference in how certain people are developed and even the extremes they can reach.


Since blacks only represent 13% of the population, it would be common sense that most consumer products are marketed towards whites - as you said. And although this doesn't mean white people are "better", I don't understand why we SHOULDN'T be looking for the new blond bomber, if you were implying it's a bad thing? lol

Personally, as a white man with blond hair, I would love to see a great bodybuilder like that for the same reason hispanic fans love to root for hispanic bodybuilders and why you like Lee Haney so much. Dennis Wolf got a lot of hype because he was awesome and a lot of people can relate to a development with that structure and skin tone. People loved Draper for the same reason.


And there it is.. Haha THE big debate this whole question was based off of.

Not criticising ANYONE's post here, just pointing out, that is THE two battling arguments that have been floating around on this whole subject.

Report Post
 

Nick W.
Level 0

Join date: Apr 2009
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 86

At the same time though... Despite the initial question, doesn't it also seem like it's now heading the OTHER way around? You see more Dexter, Phil, victor etc. all over the covers more and more.. The Fitness Atlantic flyers, Looking at the Nationals line-up for the 2009 year as well... Again I view nothing wrong with any race in this sport, just pointing it out for the point of discussion, but I have actually herd 2 of my friends (one non-bodybuilding) ask me if Bodyubuilding was becoming like basketball, after reading a Flex. (Apollogies if any of this sounds racist.. it's not). At the same time, Professor X has a point w. the "All American Guy" blond bomber look....

Report Post
 

davidcox1
Level 2

Join date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois, USA
Posts: 580

I don't believe Jay did or ever could beat Ronnie on the stage. I think Bob Paris, in his book "Gorilla Suit" talks about the preference for bodybuilders who attract the target market (Whites) of the publishers (Weider really). I also think this is changing because society is changing. We're becoming ever more diverse and will continue to do so. I think there is a huge market out there for the publisher willing to become the go-to bodybuilding magazine for young black guys interested in the sport. Right now, there is a market, and it is under/un-served.

Report Post
 

Professor X
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 32015

mr popular wrote:

I hear this a lot, and I agree that black men typically show better potential for a small waist, lower bodyfat, and bigger arms, but their legs and forearms almost always leave something to be desired in my experience.


Forearms? WUT? While black men may be known for some having smaller calves, when has the small forearm label ever been applied? Hell, I had people commenting on my forearms back when I was skinny in high school and sure haven't seen the disproportionate number of black bodybuilders with smaller than average forearms.

On top of that, calves have NEVER made or broken someone's chances as a pro bodybuilder. It isn't like someone is going to be denied winning a trophy because while EVERYTHING else was huge, their calves only measured 17". Blacks aren't exactly known for small quads either. It may affect you at the very top of the sport for the Olympia crown, but nowhere else are calves a limiting factor like that.



It would be like saying that just because Asians tend to be leaner and have big calves, that they have better "bodybuilding genetics". It isn't really accurate.


No one would say that because big calves alone don't make or break a physique and never have. On the other hand, there are MANY bodybuilders throughout the last 40 years who were HUGE everywhere but average in the calf department. Look at guys like Johnnie Jackson.



Has anybody actually noticed any real discrepancies between how well black guys and white guys are able to build their chest, shoulders, back, traps? I haven't.


I have. In general, the size difference alone between SERIOUS bodybuilders can be noted. In fact, I would say it is RARE to see a black male bodybuilder with a small chest in spite of being HUGE everywhere else but I see many white bodybuilders with lacking chest development in spite of being huge everywhere else.



This also completely ignores the fact that black americans have a 51% higher prevalence of obesity compared to whites. I guess those great bodyfat genetics don't count for much.


I think you would also find a larger occurrence of lean body mass as well even in the obese people. I don't think anyone here is saying there are no negatives or that ALL blacks are better proportioned. Obviously that is a ridiculous statement.




How many lousy white rate-my-physique posters have we had that want to look like Brad Pitt, David Beckham, or don't look up to anyone at all? Probably countless.

How many black guys look up to Brad Pitt? My guess: not a whole lot.

Black guys look up to muscular athletes a hell of a lot more than white guys do. I think this has had a huge cultural impact on the goals and physiques we see today between the two races, and accounts for a lot of the discrepancies that people are trying to label as "genetics".


Agreed. There is a rather huge cultural discrepancy. Income level would also be a factor as it would be in your best interest to NOT look like a target if you grew up in a rough neighborhood...therefore, I have no doubt that people growing up in upper middle class homes likely feel less NEED to actually train regularly outside of sports.


Since blacks only represent 13% of the population, it would be common sense that most consumer products are marketed towards whites - as you said. And although this doesn't mean white people are "better", I don't understand why we SHOULDN'T be looking for the new blond bomber, if you were implying it's a bad thing? lol


It can definitely be a bad thing just like not seeing any black Barbie Dolls growing up until the 90's could have affected black women in this country. While whites may make up the majority, denying other cultures from exposure has the potential to negatively affect entire cultures if ignored.



Personally, as a white man with blond hair, I would love to see a great bodybuilder like that for the same reason hispanic fans love to root for hispanic bodybuilders and why you like Lee Haney so much. Dennis Wolf got a lot of hype because he was awesome and a lot of people can relate to a development with that structure and skin tone. People loved Draper for the same reason.



No one is saying it is wrong for you to want to see someone who looks like you. I am saying it is wrong that millions of black kids (and other minority cultures) grew up through the 60's, 70's and even 80's without experiencing the same.

Report Post
 

Bill Roberts
Level 5

Join date: Mar 2003
Location:
Posts: 7471

I think it's fair to say there's a genetic element.

Bringing up the question of whether people in the ordinary percentiles have higher obesity rates or not is completely irrelevant.

The only people that are relevant for discussion of who makes it as competitive bodybuilders are those in the top 1% of genetics, or really perhaps in the 1/10th or 1/100th of one percent.

The frequency of finding given qualities at the extremes is NOT predicted simply by frequency among the ordinary. Thus you could have, for example, a higher percentage of obese blacks than whites (though this may not be genetic) while finding among those who are more gifted for bodybuilding better genetics among blacks for being lean than with whites, in terms of frequency.

On the social element, I think that's a good point. For example, I have a friend who is Puerto Rican and a doctor and has certainly better than average genetics, and used to be fairly serious about training (never really dedicated though.) These days he stays reasonably trim but the muscle is gone. He doesn't care. At all.

While it wouldn't always be the case of course, I do tend to agree that on average a black guy in the exact same situation would quite likely have stuck with the training and accomplished and maintained more with his physique, even with the same genetics other than those controlling racial appearance.

And as mentioned, you have a lot of white guys who think of some fairly small Hollywood actor as having their ideal physique, while that would be less common among black men I think. Not too many black men would pick as a physical role model say the black equivalent of Toby McGuire, whoever that might be.

This factor if correct is not important as to whether a given top bodybuilder of one race will do more with himself than another of another race, but certainly could have to do with how many in fact choose to dedicate themselves that much.

Lastly, as to the magazines now giving a great deal of coverage to great current black bodybuilders: How could they not. It would be simply ridiculous if they didn't.

Report Post
 

Nick W.
Level 0

Join date: Apr 2009
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 86

Bill Roberts wrote:
I think it's fair to say there's a genetic element.

Bringing up the question of whether people in the ordinary percentiles have higher obesity rates or not is completely irrelevant.

The only people that are relevant for discussion of who makes it as competitive bodybuilders are those in the top 1% of genetics, or really perhaps in the 1/10th or 1/100th of one percent.

The frequency of finding given qualities at the extremes is NOT predicted simply by frequency among the ordinary. Thus you could have, for example, a higher percentage of obese blacks than whites (though this may not be genetic) while finding among those who are more gifted for bodybuilding better genetics among blacks for being lean than with whites, in terms of frequency.

On the social element, I think that's a good point. For example, I have a friend who is Puerto Rican and a doctor and has certainly better than average genetics, and used to be fairly serious about training (never really dedicated though.) These days he stays reasonably trim but the muscle is gone. He doesn't care. At all.

While it wouldn't always be the case of course, I do tend to agree that on average a black guy in the exact same situation would quite likely have stuck with the training and accomplished and maintained more with his physique, even with the same genetics other than those controlling racial appearance.

And as mentioned, you have a lot of white guys who think of some fairly small Hollywood actor as having their ideal physique, while that would be less common among black men I think. Not too many black men would pick as a physical role model say the black equivalent of Toby McGuire, whoever that might be.

This factor if correct is not important as to whether a given top bodybuilder of one race will do more with himself than another of another race, but certainly could have to do with how many in fact choose to dedicate themselves that much.

Lastly, as to the magazines now giving a great deal of coverage to great current black bodybuilders: How could they not. It would be simply ridiculous if they didn't.



That's an extremely sensible way of looking at it. The top 1% or less as you said, would really be the only ones who could determine this, given all of the cultural/enviromental differences.. And I definitly agree with that last statement, your entire theory above backs that up completely.

Report Post
 

Professor X
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 32015

Nick W. wrote:
Bill Roberts wrote:
I think it's fair to say there's a genetic element.

Bringing up the question of whether people in the ordinary percentiles have higher obesity rates or not is completely irrelevant.

The only people that are relevant for discussion of who makes it as competitive bodybuilders are those in the top 1% of genetics, or really perhaps in the 1/10th or 1/100th of one percent.

The frequency of finding given qualities at the extremes is NOT predicted simply by frequency among the ordinary. Thus you could have, for example, a higher percentage of obese blacks than whites (though this may not be genetic) while finding among those who are more gifted for bodybuilding better genetics among blacks for being lean than with whites, in terms of frequency.

On the social element, I think that's a good point. For example, I have a friend who is Puerto Rican and a doctor and has certainly better than average genetics, and used to be fairly serious about training (never really dedicated though.) These days he stays reasonably trim but the muscle is gone. He doesn't care. At all.

While it wouldn't always be the case of course, I do tend to agree that on average a black guy in the exact same situation would quite likely have stuck with the training and accomplished and maintained more with his physique, even with the same genetics other than those controlling racial appearance.

And as mentioned, you have a lot of white guys who think of some fairly small Hollywood actor as having their ideal physique, while that would be less common among black men I think. Not too many black men would pick as a physical role model say the black equivalent of Toby McGuire, whoever that might be.

This factor if correct is not important as to whether a given top bodybuilder of one race will do more with himself than another of another race, but certainly could have to do with how many in fact choose to dedicate themselves that much.

Lastly, as to the magazines now giving a great deal of coverage to great current black bodybuilders: How could they not. It would be simply ridiculous if they didn't.



That's an extremely sensible way of looking at it. The top 1% or less as you said, would really be the only ones who could determine this, given all of the cultural/enviromental differences.. And I definitly agree with that last statement, your entire theory above backs that up completely.



Yeah, but his last statement should make you wonder why people like your friends suddenly made a remark relating this to basketball...or why this would be an issue at all to anyone in a negative light. Does anyone really believe bodybuilders like Sergio Oliva and Robby Robinson got the respect they really deserved compared to guys like Arnold and Lou Ferrigno back in the 60's and 70's? In 2010, for anyone to ignore guys like Phil Heath (who has some of the freakiest arms and delts since Levrone), Kai Greene (who is quite possibly one of the most stand out personalities since Arnold in bodybuilding as well as one of the most massive), and Toney Freeman (a true freak who at 6'2" has a smaller waist than guys 4 inches shorter than him) would be fucking criminal.

Report Post
 

KBCThird
Level 3

Join date: Apr 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 2491

To answer the shorter question: Ronnie. By a mile. Best bodybuilder of all time, in my opinion

Report Post
 

Nick W.
Level 0

Join date: Apr 2009
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 86

Professor X wrote:
Nick W. wrote:
Bill Roberts wrote:
I think it's fair to say there's a genetic element.

Bringing up the question of whether people in the ordinary percentiles have higher obesity rates or not is completely irrelevant.

The only people that are relevant for discussion of who makes it as competitive bodybuilders are those in the top 1% of genetics, or really perhaps in the 1/10th or 1/100th of one percent.

The frequency of finding given qualities at the extremes is NOT predicted simply by frequency among the ordinary. Thus you could have, for example, a higher percentage of obese blacks than whites (though this may not be genetic) while finding among those who are more gifted for bodybuilding better genetics among blacks for being lean than with whites, in terms of frequency.

On the social element, I think that's a good point. For example, I have a friend who is Puerto Rican and a doctor and has certainly better than average genetics, and used to be fairly serious about training (never really dedicated though.) These days he stays reasonably trim but the muscle is gone. He doesn't care. At all.

While it wouldn't always be the case of course, I do tend to agree that on average a black guy in the exact same situation would quite likely have stuck with the training and accomplished and maintained more with his physique, even with the same genetics other than those controlling racial appearance.

And as mentioned, you have a lot of white guys who think of some fairly small Hollywood actor as having their ideal physique, while that would be less common among black men I think. Not too many black men would pick as a physical role model say the black equivalent of Toby McGuire, whoever that might be.

This factor if correct is not important as to whether a given top bodybuilder of one race will do more with himself than another of another race, but certainly could have to do with how many in fact choose to dedicate themselves that much.

Lastly, as to the magazines now giving a great deal of coverage to great current black bodybuilders: How could they not. It would be simply ridiculous if they didn't.



That's an extremely sensible way of looking at it. The top 1% or less as you said, would really be the only ones who could determine this, given all of the cultural/enviromental differences.. And I definitly agree with that last statement, your entire theory above backs that up completely.



Yeah, but his last statement should make you wonder why people like your friends suddenly made a remark relating this to basketball...or why this would be an issue at all to anyone in a negative light. Does anyone really believe bodybuilders like Sergio Oliva and Robby Robinson got the respect they really deserved compared to guys like Arnold and Lou Ferrigno back in the 60's and 70's? In 2010, for anyone to ignore guys like Phil Heath (who has some of the freakiest arms and delts since Levrone), Kai Greene (who is quite possibly one of the most stand out personalities since Arnold in bodybuilding as well as one of the most massive), and Toney Freeman (a true freak who at 6'2" has a smaller waist than guys 4 inches shorter than him) would be fucking criminal.


True that, Heath and Kai are insane! My friends werent asking about it in a negative respect, they were just wondering if it was becoming a perdominantly "black sport".. It was directed in nothing more than a sincere question, not a spiteful statement. I personally see a pertty even ballance. Flex was actually going over the line-ups of some of the top shows, and it showed thatThere was very few Americans, and more foreing bodybuilders, of various ethnicities. Which just goes back to culture/enviroment as apposed to just genetics.

Report Post
 

Professor X
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 32015

Nick W. wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Nick W. wrote:
Bill Roberts wrote:
I think it's fair to say there's a genetic element.

Bringing up the question of whether people in the ordinary percentiles have higher obesity rates or not is completely irrelevant.

The only people that are relevant for discussion of who makes it as competitive bodybuilders are those in the top 1% of genetics, or really perhaps in the 1/10th or 1/100th of one percent.

The frequency of finding given qualities at the extremes is NOT predicted simply by frequency among the ordinary. Thus you could have, for example, a higher percentage of obese blacks than whites (though this may not be genetic) while finding among those who are more gifted for bodybuilding better genetics among blacks for being lean than with whites, in terms of frequency.

On the social element, I think that's a good point. For example, I have a friend who is Puerto Rican and a doctor and has certainly better than average genetics, and used to be fairly serious about training (never really dedicated though.) These days he stays reasonably trim but the muscle is gone. He doesn't care. At all.

While it wouldn't always be the case of course, I do tend to agree that on average a black guy in the exact same situation would quite likely have stuck with the training and accomplished and maintained more with his physique, even with the same genetics other than those controlling racial appearance.

And as mentioned, you have a lot of white guys who think of some fairly small Hollywood actor as having their ideal physique, while that would be less common among black men I think. Not too many black men would pick as a physical role model say the black equivalent of Toby McGuire, whoever that might be.

This factor if correct is not important as to whether a given top bodybuilder of one race will do more with himself than another of another race, but certainly could have to do with how many in fact choose to dedicate themselves that much.

Lastly, as to the magazines now giving a great deal of coverage to great current black bodybuilders: How could they not. It would be simply ridiculous if they didn't.



That's an extremely sensible way of looking at it. The top 1% or less as you said, would really be the only ones who could determine this, given all of the cultural/enviromental differences.. And I definitly agree with that last statement, your entire theory above backs that up completely.



Yeah, but his last statement should make you wonder why people like your friends suddenly made a remark relating this to basketball...or why this would be an issue at all to anyone in a negative light. Does anyone really believe bodybuilders like Sergio Oliva and Robby Robinson got the respect they really deserved compared to guys like Arnold and Lou Ferrigno back in the 60's and 70's? In 2010, for anyone to ignore guys like Phil Heath (who has some of the freakiest arms and delts since Levrone), Kai Greene (who is quite possibly one of the most stand out personalities since Arnold in bodybuilding as well as one of the most massive), and Toney Freeman (a true freak who at 6'2" has a smaller waist than guys 4 inches shorter than him) would be fucking criminal.


True that, Heath and Kai are insane! My friends werent asking about it in a negative respect, they were just wondering if it was becoming a perdominantly "black sport".. It was directed in nothing more than a sincere question, not a spiteful statement. I personally see a pertty even ballance. Flex was actually going over the line-ups of some of the top shows, and it showed thatThere was very few Americans, and more foreing bodybuilders, of various ethnicities. Which just goes back to culture/enviroment as apposed to just genetics.



I simply find it funny that in a country where whites dominated the scene from sports to entertainment until the late 80's (sports may be drawn back to around the late 70's) that people see a few black guys in a muscle mag and start crying about how the entire sport is being overrun with black people.

Report Post
 

Nick W.
Level 0

Join date: Apr 2009
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 86

Professor X wrote:
Nick W. wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Nick W. wrote:
Bill Roberts wrote:
I think it's fair to say there's a genetic element.

Bringing up the question of whether people in the ordinary percentiles have higher obesity rates or not is completely irrelevant.

The only people that are relevant for discussion of who makes it as competitive bodybuilders are those in the top 1% of genetics, or really perhaps in the 1/10th or 1/100th of one percent.

The frequency of finding given qualities at the extremes is NOT predicted simply by frequency among the ordinary. Thus you could have, for example, a higher percentage of obese blacks than whites (though this may not be genetic) while finding among those who are more gifted for bodybuilding better genetics among blacks for being lean than with whites, in terms of frequency.

On the social element, I think that's a good point. For example, I have a friend who is Puerto Rican and a doctor and has certainly better than average genetics, and used to be fairly serious about training (never really dedicated though.) These days he stays reasonably trim but the muscle is gone. He doesn't care. At all.

While it wouldn't always be the case of course, I do tend to agree that on average a black guy in the exact same situation would quite likely have stuck with the training and accomplished and maintained more with his physique, even with the same genetics other than those controlling racial appearance.

And as mentioned, you have a lot of white guys who think of some fairly small Hollywood actor as having their ideal physique, while that would be less common among black men I think. Not too many black men would pick as a physical role model say the black equivalent of Toby McGuire, whoever that might be.

This factor if correct is not important as to whether a given top bodybuilder of one race will do more with himself than another of another race, but certainly could have to do with how many in fact choose to dedicate themselves that much.

Lastly, as to the magazines now giving a great deal of coverage to great current black bodybuilders: How could they not. It would be simply ridiculous if they didn't.



That's an extremely sensible way of looking at it. The top 1% or less as you said, would really be the only ones who could determine this, given all of the cultural/enviromental differences.. And I definitly agree with that last statement, your entire theory above backs that up completely.



Yeah, but his last statement should make you wonder why people like your friends suddenly made a remark relating this to basketball...or why this would be an issue at all to anyone in a negative light. Does anyone really believe bodybuilders like Sergio Oliva and Robby Robinson got the respect they really deserved compared to guys like Arnold and Lou Ferrigno back in the 60's and 70's? In 2010, for anyone to ignore guys like Phil Heath (who has some of the freakiest arms and delts since Levrone), Kai Greene (who is quite possibly one of the most stand out personalities since Arnold in bodybuilding as well as one of the most massive), and Toney Freeman (a true freak who at 6'2" has a smaller waist than guys 4 inches shorter than him) would be fucking criminal.


True that, Heath and Kai are insane! My friends werent asking about it in a negative respect, they were just wondering if it was becoming a perdominantly "black sport".. It was directed in nothing more than a sincere question, not a spiteful statement. I personally see a pertty even ballance. Flex was actually going over the line-ups of some of the top shows, and it showed thatThere was very few Americans, and more foreing bodybuilders, of various ethnicities. Which just goes back to culture/enviroment as apposed to just genetics.



I simply find it funny that in a country where whites dominated the scene from sports to entertainment until the late 80's (sports may be drawn back to around the late 70's) that people see a few black guys in a muscle mag and start crying about how the entire sport is being overrun with black people.


I didn't even think about the fact that everything used to be more white-washen than a blizzard ni New England.. Well like I said, I see no issue, was just wondering what everyone elses input was.

Report Post
 

TheBigV
Level 1

Join date: Jun 2008
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 498

Nick W. wrote:
I didn't even think about the fact that everything used to be more white-washen than a blizzard ni New England.. Well like I said, I see no issue, was just wondering what everyone elses input was.


Larry Scott (1965 & 1966) (White)
Sergio Oliva (1967 - 1969) (Black)
Arnold Schwarzenegger (1970 - 75 & 1980) (White)
Franco Columbu (1976 & 1981) (White)
Frank Zane (1977 - 1979) (White)
Chris Dickerson (1982) (Black)
Lee Haney (1984 - 1991) (Black)
Dorian Yates (1992 - 1997) (White)
Ronnie Coleman (1998 - 2005) (Black)
Jay Cutler (2006, 2007 & 2009) (White)
Dex Jackson (2008) (Black)

At first it seems back and forth, white and black, but really if you add up the years...

22 to the white guys, 21 to the black guys, and 1 to Samir, who was born in Beirut, Lebanon.

Samir Bannout (1983) (Middle Eastern)

But half of winning the Olypmia is politics (or so I've heard) and you can tell the general shift from more white Olympia winners to more black Olympia winners, especially with Haney, one of my favorite bbers.

Report Post
 

Bill Roberts
Level 5

Join date: Mar 2003
Location:
Posts: 7471

As personal opinion, the one true screw-job was Sergio Oliva but I am not convinced that this was really from race, or even principally from commercial effect of race (in other words, difference in money-producing potential if everything somehow were the same but race.)

First, no one seems ever to have picked up a trace of racial prejudice, personally, in Joe Weider. That just seems to be a problem he didn't have.

And second, Oliva did have two other strikes against him.

Norman Mailer wrote regarding Frazier and Ali, "There can never be two truly great heavyweights at the same time: One must always eclipse the other."

The same I think was true for Arnold and Oliva. Only one of them was going to have the ascendancy in their day. Bad luck for Oliva that Arnold combined being a good enough bodybuilder to be competitive with him with his other traits such as charisma which made him much more of a money-producer, even aside from any racial factor.

And second, Oliva's physique was decades ahead of his time. He was the ONLY X-frame physique of his day. As personal opinion, if the great classical artists could have used Arnold as their model, they'd have thought him ideal for a statue of a god, or as a vision of the ideal man. Oliva? No, he was from another planet.

I do think Oliva got nothing like the success and acclamation he really deserved. But I don't think racial prejudice, even of magazine and supplement buyers as opposed to Weider himself, really was the main strike against him.

But was there some racial commercial factor? I agree there probably was -- Robbie Robinson didn't have the above strikes, and while he DID get a pretty good amount of coverage I think it's fair to say it wasn't as much as his physique warranted.

Report Post
 

TheBigV
Level 1

Join date: Jun 2008
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 498

One of my favorites

Report Post
 

Gregus
Level 1

Join date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 1889

Yada yada yada.

Everyone, every human on this planet appreciates the visible hard work and determination of another human being. We all can aspire to their level. But the fact remains that everyone will be the most inspired by the person they relate to the most.

So black dudes will prefer to see black freaks, White dudes prefer white freaks, Spanish Dudes prefer Spanish Freaks and Asians would prefer an Asian to show them that they can too be freaks.

I feel like race relations are the stress we have not yet learned to handle. It's a tense topic for no reason. Yes there are genetic racial differences, with some offering advantages in certain areas. They can be celebrated and enjoyed due to the diversity and differing levels of effort and myriad of approaches required to make bodybuilding happen, regardless of race.

Each race has their genetic weakness to overcome. It should also be pointed out that the individuals like Arnold, Haney and Olivia are the genetic cream of the crop and far from being representative of ANY race or population. lol. They are in their own leagues.


And as far as Sergio. He was a huge Freak for his day. But honestly alot of his muscles are not aesthetic. They are bulky and crude looking. Very little artistic Finesse to him. Paul Dillet Had the same Problem. Loved the Dude for the Freak he was. Like a Demigod. Still miss him competing, but unfortunately he was also built with a less then aesthetic figure. Nothing racial there. Just facts.


I also think it sucks that Shawn Ray could not get a cover till later. It's not the public's fault. Someone in the boardroom somewhere makes those decisions. If there was true racism noon would buy the magazines with a black dude on the cover. They White people that buy this stuff don't care. They like any human being, like to see the effects of hard work and determination on a person of any color. Magazine sales took off and never looked back. So much for the supposed "secret" racism. lol.

Report Post
 

anonym
Level 3

Join date: Jan 2008
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 1893

I've always liked Dillet's build quite a bit... just thought his posing was a tad awkward.

Report Post
 

Professor X
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 32015

Gregus wrote:


I also think it sucks that Shawn Ray could not get a cover till later. It's not the public's fault. Someone in the boardroom somewhere makes those decisions.



LOL.

That's like saying the Civil Rights movements wasn't necessary because the "public" wasn't racist, just the guys hiring and firing people for jobs, the politicians making decisions on a grand scale, the restaurants that wouldn't serve minorities, the "colored only" water fountains, and the complete lack of accomplished and educated black men in popular media.....but "the public" was cool with the darkies!!

Report Post
 

BONEZ217
Level 2

Join date: Feb 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4810

Professor X wrote:
Gregus wrote:


I also think it sucks that Shawn Ray could not get a cover till later. It's not the public's fault. Someone in the boardroom somewhere makes those decisions.



LOL.

That's like saying the Civil Rights movements wasn't necessary because the "public" wasn't racist, just the guys hiring and firing people for jobs, the politicians making decisions on a grand scale, the restaurants that wouldn't serve minorities, the "colored only" water fountains, and the complete lack of accomplished and educated black men in popular media.....but "the public" was cool with the darkies!!



That's an overblown analogy and you know it.

I obviously understand the point you are trying to make but that is a sensationalist viewpoint, even for you.

Being on a magazine cover isn't a basic human right. Shawn Ray is well known for having a big mouth. Is it possible that he pissed off a few too many people who had decision making power? Or maybe the editor felt that he was too polarizing and wouldn't be as good for sales as someone else.

There's no way you know that Ray didn't get a cover because of racist people.

Report Post
1 2 | Next Last