Testosterone Nation
SEARCH

Advanced | Members

HOME    T-NATION FORUMS    TMUSCLE STORE     LOG IN
TMUSCLE Store
Flameout

Where Did 'Bodybuilders are Weak' Start?
Rating
1 2 3 4 | Next Last
 

redkevin79
Level 4

Join date: Dec 2007
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 35

I ask this seriously, where did this idea/notion/rumor start? And if it was started, with what evidence/proof was it backed up with. Was there a point in bodybuilding's history that all of a sudden its top competitors achieved their physique devoid of any respectable strength?

Who was the weak ass bodybuilder that perpetuated this myth?

It seems like people commonly associate strength with powerlifting and size with bodybuilding. But a 495x3 bench by Levrone seems like a pretty significant feat if you ask me? Considering a lot of powerlifters seem pressed(no pun intended) to achieve that with bench shirts for even a single rep, let alone RAW.

This is something that I initially bit on hook line and sinker as I was just starting out, but now, cant believe I bought into given the amount of video proof showing countless bodybuilders moving some incredible weight for reps with impeccable form. Decade after decade!

Are these the same people who got me to buy the ab lounge? that work for fox news? that started national kick a ginger day?

Report Post
 

doubleh
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2007
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 386

Have wondered this myself...

My guess is that the ignorant public, when comparing, say, elite-level BBs and PLs, naturally assume the BBs are stronger b/c they look so much stronger. Then upon seeing the #s put up by the Coans of the world, wonder why the massive BBs can't do the same.

In fact, the ONLY people they appear "weak" next to are elite, national-level PLs.

Report Post
 

austin_bicep
Level 1

Join date: Sep 2007
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 2616

Jealousy man. You can't look pretty and lift big. Haha gtfo with that shit.

Report Post
 

jehovasfitness
Level 4

Join date: Jan 2006
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 8546

I would venture a guess that it started in the fitness industry. There's a lot of hate on BBing in the fitness industry, in which I took part in, in the past.

Report Post
 

Madman2
Level 3

Join date: Dec 2003
Location:
Posts: 683

I first heard it through Pavel Tsatsouline. He was comparing relative strength levels. Don't know whether he picked it up elsewhere or not. Don't have a clue as to who started it.

Report Post
 

PimpBot5000
Level 0

Join date: May 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 1166

redkevin79 wrote:

Who was the weak ass bodybuilder that perpetuated this myth?



Paul Dillett. He did train with weights that many would consider "light". The part that people seem to forget is that he could probably deadlift a Ford F150 if he wanted.

Report Post
 

spyoptic
Level 1

Join date: Nov 2008
Location:
Posts: 856

probably by a leviathan powerlifter who hadn't seen his dick in a decade.

Report Post
 

Professor X
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 32015

PimpBot5000 wrote:
redkevin79 wrote:

Who was the weak ass bodybuilder that perpetuated this myth?



Paul Dillett. He did train with weights that many would consider "light". The part that people seem to forget is that he could probably deadlift a Ford F150 if he wanted.




Dillet was never associated with being weak. You only hear this crap today from "fitness trainers" in justification of "relative strength"....two things that are equally full of shit.

The truth is, some of the biggest guys here are also some of the strongest and no body gets huge without getting a hell of a lot stronger even if strength itself isn't the main goal.

I also know Poliquin made some statement about bodybuilders who were huge yet could only curl 35lbs dumbbells....something I have NEVER seen in any gym I've ever trained in.

I guess any time some newb sees me warming up, they think that is ALL I can lift.

Report Post
 

austin_bicep
Level 1

Join date: Sep 2007
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 2616

My other post didn't show :(.

As I was saying, to be fair, Levrone benched 500 x 4 on M3, yes with a slight spot on rep 4 but still. In that movie, and I'll double check, he is 2 weeks out from the O, 2 fucking weeks out, dieted down, and "weak," that's bad ass and one strong mother fucker.

I saw vids of Branch Warren seated military press 315 x 20. Fucking monster. These dudes are some of the strongest in the world.

Report Post
 

Bill Roberts
Level 5

Join date: Mar 2003
Location:
Posts: 7471

Many feel a psychological need, when seeing someone that they feel (but perhaps will not consciously admit) is superior to them in some quality, to denigrate the quality in question, or the person.

Report Post
 

PimpBot5000
Level 0

Join date: May 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 1166

Professor X wrote:

Dillet was never associated with being weak. You only hear this crap today from "fitness trainers" in justification of "relative strength"....two things that are equally full of shit.



Could be mistaken, but didn't Tom Prince and a few other bodybuilders at the time make the claim that Paul was very weak for his size?

Report Post
 

spyoptic
Level 1

Join date: Nov 2008
Location:
Posts: 856

Bill Roberts wrote:
Many feel a psychological need, when seeing someone that they feel (but perhaps will not consciously admit) is superior to them in some quality, to denigrate the quality in question, or the person.



Yes. Its at the source of every identifiable conflict in history and how humans are capable of being biased toward their own social group so what big whoop wanna fight about it?

Report Post
 

WestCoast7
Level 0

Join date: Aug 2009
Location: California, USA
Posts: 1037

Bill Roberts wrote:
Many feel a psychological need, when seeing someone that they feel (but perhaps will not consciously admit) is superior to them in some quality, to denigrate the quality in question, or the person.


A universal truth.

Report Post
 

mr popular
Level 1

Join date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 1951

This myth isn't anything new, and has been around for many decades. It likely stems from jealousy and misunderstanding.

Report Post
 

A Ninny Mouse
Level 0

Join date: Sep 2009
Location:
Posts: 177

I suspect it may stem from the whole, bodybuilders aren't maxing all the time, so on any given day, on any given set, they're not lifting AS much weight as, say, a somwhat comparable powerlifter. And then rift went from not AS heavy to light versus heavy, maybe as bodybuilding became less prominent in popular media? All pure conjecture on my part. Though at my (university) gym, it would seem like the only way to get big arms is with heavy partials. Just my two cents, though.

Report Post
 

elano
Level 1

Join date: May 2008
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 2937

Where are all these people calling bbers weak? Anyone have a link to a site or article claiming this?

Report Post
 

belligerent
Level 1

Join date: Sep 2003
Location:
Posts: 1821

Paul Chek.

Report Post
 

Professor X
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 32015

elano wrote:
Where are all these people calling bbers weak? Anyone have a link to a site or article claiming this?



I just mentioned Poliquin but I have to go find the specific article for you too?

When personal trainers go on about how bodybuilders can't climb stairs, you don't see the connection?

Hell, on this site we got comments like that frequently in the bodybuilding forum from newbs who got this impression from whatever trainer's article they were reading.

When so many got the impression that doing biceps curls was for weaklings or pretty boys (as if they were unnecessary or didn't aid in strength enough to worry about), you didn't see who this was aimed at?

Someone literally has to go find all of this for you in order to notice it?

Report Post
 

red04
Level 4

Join date: Jun 2007
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1119

Part of it probably stems from just ignorance of people not understanding how rep strength correlates to max effort strength, and that the general population doesn't see top end bodybuilders, they see low level aspiring BBers and the weights they're using and convince themselves that "it's not that much more than I do."

Or they just pick apart 1 video from someone like Brandon Ray with a very controlled style of lifting and say "there, bbers are so weak, most PLers kill that guys numbers."

Report Post
 

DJS
Level 4

Join date: May 2003
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 606

I'm pretty sure this started with bodybuilding mags shockingly... When I was a kid and I read all the mags, they never ever stressed progression. It was always stressed that the wieght on the bar didn't matter. What mattered was straight sets, perfect form, slow reps, hold the stretch, squeeze the muscle hard at the contraction. Basically.. if you get a burn and a pump your doing it right. They never said anything like "If you do the same weight.. session after session, week after week, month after month, you won't grow.

You get a little stronger but progression is very slow when you train like that. So after a while you switch to the next program they give you. Which is all the same as above with different exercises and/or order.

It started like that and then was taken way too far buy certain authors. Authors are under pressure to come up with something new everytime they come out with an article. It's like a huge game of telephone. The years go by and there is so much BS intertwined with common knowledge on training its shocking.

Report Post
 

Harizard
Level 0

Join date: Apr 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 233

Haha national kick a ginger day. When is this date?

I must mark it on my calendar...

Report Post
 

malonetd
Level 3

Join date: May 2004
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 4899

elano wrote:
Where are all these people calling bbers weak? Anyone have a link to a site or article claiming this?


Here's some stuff from Poliquin:

http://www.tmuscle.com/...weights&cr=

http://www.tmuscle.com/..._011806&cr=

And here he mentions curling with 35's. It's the second paragraph under the Ronnie Coleman pic halfway down:

http://www.tmuscle.com/...january&cr=

Report Post
 

drewh
Level 0

Join date: Jul 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 1386

Aren't Jay and Flex considered weak compared to a Ronnie or Arnold?

Report Post
 

Nards
Level 0

Join date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 847

One thing that may only be me, but in the late 80s, and the 90s, many photo shoots for the magazines, with guys with too much gel in the hair, with ripped denim shorts with suspenders but no shirt wearing work boots with a buddy next to them also with a fake expression may have made many people think BBers were all show.

There are still many great ways to photograph modern BBers and make them look insanely powerful, look at the Animal Pak ads.

I also think it may be natural for people to see the 70s BB look, (non-competition time) where they looked big, but smooth by current standards as being healthier and therefore they were stronger.
It may just be me, but some ripped, overly-vascular behemoth (someone like Branch Warren) just doesn't look as strong as Franco Columbu for example.

Report Post
 

Gregus
Level 1

Join date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 1889

Look it's simple. Lets not over complicate things.


Powerlifters = Purpose is to lift ever greater weights.

Bodybuilders = Purpose to find what makes "YOUR" muscles respond and grow. The "Weight" of the weights handled are a distant second to the focus in your workout.

This is why an average person can see a visually muscular dude say finishing a set of biceps with a 25lb Db to bring it to complete failure and think " man for all that muscle he only lifts a 25lb db?"

This is followed by the said average person taking a heavier weight and doing the same exercise next to the bodybuilder and feeling like they fit right in.

Then they look at the powerlifter and see a loaded bar full of plates for deadlifts and watch the misconceptions and rumors start lol :)


Report Post
1 2 3 4 5 | Next Last