| Workout to Save the Lower Back? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ozzyaaron
Level 0
Join date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 207
|
|
Relevant info up top, other shite at the bottom.
I have a really close friend and her hubby that I'll be doing a bit of training with from time to time. We'll get togehter once every couple of weeks to sort of 'check in' and she'll do weight 3-4 times a week. She's never weight trained (typical pilates/yogo, boxing, running type of stuff) but has great genetics, he's worked out quite a bit but I think it's mostly pretty weak stuff, he has a skinny build.
The main issue is she's fought lower back pain for the majority of the time I've known her and has done physio, pilates, yoga, chiro and never had any lasting results. She's quite top heavy if that actually makes a difference ...
I really want to get her doing complex movements and full body stuff, but also want to save her back. Here is my idea for the first program.
10min warm up (lunges, side squats, shoulders, hold bottom squat pos for a while, arse kicks, knee pulls etc, just a warm up concentrating on hip flexibility mostly)
A1 - Bench Press of some sort
A2 - DB Row/Rowing
A3 - BB/DB Lunges and back squat
B1 - Push press
B2 - Lat Pull Down/chin up
B3 - Clean
I think that the only worrying aspects are the rowing, squatting and cleans. My thoughts are if technique is taught properly from teh start and weight is kept in check so that technique is good then the lower back should only prosper from improved strength in muscles around it?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated, maybe other exercises that I can chuck in too.
I've been training myself for about 4 years now and have been through the 3x10, 5x5, push/pull, full body, isolation work outs in that time. I've been doing the stripped down hypertrophy program for about 4 months now just changing exercises up in that time and have seen great improvements in strength and muscle.
Given BF% over the last two years I've added between 10-12kg of muscle. Prior to that I lost 100kg, so given the transformation people are always asking me for tips and stuff. I try to keep it very broad and only help those that I think actually want to change. |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
DragnCarry
Level 0
Join date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 696
|
|
ozzyaaron wrote:
My thoughts are if technique is taught properly from teh start and weight is kept in check so that technique is good then the lower back should only prosper from improved strength in muscles around it?
Has certainly been the case for me. I think a lot of people have back pain simply because they are weak as piss, especially in the glutes. Make sure you do glute activation stuff, keep knees pushed out in squat etc
|
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
ozzyaaron
Level 0
Join date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 207
|
|
Yeah I've been squatting now for a year and have concentrated the entire time on form over weight and have never had a sore back. I'm hoping I can teach her to really concentrate on doing the same and just trusting me.
I'm thinking things will likely be different so I'll have to see proportions with her as I have short legs, I think she doesn't but I think it comes down to getting the basics down first.
My squatting really benefited when I started concentrating on cueing upward movement with squeezing my arse, or activating glutes like you say. I'll be tryign to impart all of my good habits and none of my bad ones :P
Thanks for the help! |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
Kromlic
Level 1
Join date: Mar 2008
Location: British Columbia, CAN
Posts: 187
|
|
Dragncarry nailed it. Glute work takes the strain off the erctor spinae. Additionally, focusing on strengthening the erectors has been beneficial from personal experience(good mornings, deadlifts(good form), etc.)
Before you start anyone on a heavy compound workout, ensure that any and all injuries are either addressed and resolved, or prehabed to the maximal extent... God knows you don't want to make the pain worse by accenting the weak link in the chain.
Edit- almost forgot... lunges and step-ups are great here! Just focus on the stable and straight posture. |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
DanErickson
Level 0
Join date: Dec 2006
Location: Ontario, CAN
Posts: 1289
|
|
Why back squats if you are trying to save her lower back? Squats put a lot of strain on the lower back and are unnecessary for strong legs. |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
DragnCarry
Level 0
Join date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 696
|
|
Lunges and Split Squats on the Smith are probably a safer introduction, but I honestly haven't found squats to put an undue amount of stress on the lower back unless the lifter has a habit of 'good mornings out of the hole' - in which case choosing a more appropriate load and cueing good form (pull bar down into back, head up etc) will solve the problem.
Leg Press, Front Squats and Good Mornings (if hamstring flexibility or form are poor) are much "worse" (but not necessarily to be avoided in the long-term).
Part of the issue for a lot of people is a weak posterior chain and core. Back squats, done correctly, address this very well and encourage good 'form' outside the gym in many cases.
This is assuming mobility is being addressed and that weak posterior chain and core are the main problem. |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
ozzyaaron
Level 0
Join date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 207
|
|
Are back squats definitely lower back aggravaters when done correctly?
I'm thinking for the first few weeks I might not go with squats but concentrate more on lunges to get a bit of stability and concentrate on the process of glute activation.
I think it's easy to forget how hard it was at first to really initiate movement with the correct muscles rather than just pushing the weight up. I remember it was a really foreign concept and took a few weeks to get. After that it's probably taken months to really get comfortable with my own posture, feet position, and change in focus of muscle groups on the way up.
I think I need to do some squats myself and just break it down so I can explain what I do.
This process has been good as well as I've been doing a lot of reading and watching which can only improve my own game :) |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
DragnCarry
Level 0
Join date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 696
|
|
ozzyaaron wrote:
Are back squats definitely lower back aggravaters when done correctly?
Not for me. Do it with a broomstick until you're confident. Split Squats with a Smith are difficult to get wrong in the meantime.
|
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
ozzyaaron
Level 0
Join date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 207
|
|
That's what I thought. The only time I've had a bad back from squats is when I was being a lazy fuck trying to add weight not caring about proper form. That won't be happening here.
I've gotten a few people into a few sports and I'm always eager to force them to wean themselves into it. I hate it when people smash it, get hurt or too sore and give up. Running is a great example, people go try and run as far as they can the first time out then wonder why they feel fucked aftwards. I used to run half marathons and feel pretty fresh a few hours later. It's just conditioning.
So for this I'll be wanting to start SUPER light nad just build up. Hopefully get a bit of a thrill from getting stronger, losing fat and eventually having a pain free back (or less pain!).
thanks again guys. |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
Aragorn
Level 4
Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 5361
|
|
Glute work and ab work helps the stress on the low back.
YES, man, I hate to say it, but I agree with DanErickson--don't use back squats if you're trying to save her low back. And for God's sake don't use good mornings or deadlifts!!
I love back squats. But for someone who ALREADY suffers from chronic low back pain, putting yet MORE stress on it is a terrible idea. This should be reinforced by the fact that you're not training her to be a bb'er or pl'er or even an athlete. There are PLENTY of options left. db lunges are a fantastic alternative. So are dumbbell step ups, and db bulgarian squats. I would even avoid barbell lunges.
The proper approach is to try and find out what is causing her low back pain and then find a way to alleviate it. Then and only then should you work spinal loading in.
Remember, this isn't a trainee who's just developed back pain, this is someone who's already lived with it for a long time. Get her healthy first.
Ab work, glute work, hamstring work, these all take strain off the low back. Maybe get her to do some bodyweight stuff for the low back, and then work her into light weighted exercises. Then gradually build up.
|
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
bushidobadboy
Level 4
Join date: Nov 2004
Location: Wales
Posts: 11805
|
|
Ignore Dragncarry; he is unfortunately assessing the rest of the world form his own, limited experience.
You have NO IDEA what is causing her back pain. To go with the idea that "well she's probably weak as piss - do some glute activation work" is potentially a philosophy that could ensure your 'really good friend' becomes crippled in pain.
Whilst I admire your desire to help your friend, I STRONGLY urge you to proceed with caution.
Your plan: "I really want to get her doing complex movements and full body stuff, but also want to save her back" is going to be very hard to do unless you are some sort of back specialist with a strong knowledge in exercise technique/biomechanics/soft tissue work, etc.
she has a bad back so why not actually plan a workout that stresses all the major muscle groups, but without loading the lower back.
Then you can compliment the work done to the rest of the body, buy specifically isolating and strengthening/activating ALL those muscles that might have a part to play in her back pain.
So that would be (to start with): erector spinae, QLs, glutes (all three, bilaterally), piriformis, psoas, rec.fem, ITB, TFL, adductors, hamstrings, rec. abdominus, TVA, int. + ext. obliques.
All the above muscles need to be carefully assesses for length, strength, intra and inter-muscular co-ordination. Can you do that?
Some of the truly 'back sparing' exercises I could reccommend might be:
Chest supported row
Lat pulldowns (different grips)
Bench press
Seated shoulder press (not standing)
Seated dumbell raises
Split squats and lunges (pain permitting)
Again, I admire you desire you help your friend but please don't let your enthusiasm get in the way of 'duty of care'.
BBB |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
ozzyaaron
Level 0
Join date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 207
|
|
Thanks Aragorn and BBB, those are really well thought out responses; that's why I asked here :)
I'd never considered the chest supported row, so thanks for that BBB.
I would love to leave her to a physio or some sort of rehab specialist but unfortunately she's been in and out of them for at least four years without any relief of more than a few weeks. I tend to believe it's typically a placebo type effect. She has some belief that pilates helps, but it obviously doesn't and I've done pilates a bit, it's nice as a relax (in my experience)...
In reflection, and given the last couple of posts I'm pushing the exercises I enjoy rather than stuff that will help. It's hard to take a step back and program something as if you were an absolute beginner.
I wish I had more idea on how to spot the problem, all I can do is try to be very careful. While choice of decent people may be fairly abundant in the US, it seems that in little old Perth there isn't much for good rehab people.
So basically, no I'm in no way qualified to assess the parameters your suggesting BBB, but then people that should have been obviously haven't. I'm hoping that taking feedback from her on pain and uncomfortableness, really taking notice and watching her form, reading a lot and asking questions here that I can help. Training is a real passion of mine, but not training people. I'm just wanting to help.
This is my revised workout :
A1) Bench press
A2) Chest supported row
A3) DB Lunges
B1) Seated Press
B2) Lat PD
B3) I'd like to slot something in here, I'm wondering about DB swings?
Thanks so much for the help guys, I feel like I'm getting there and definitely learning along the way.
It's starting to become clear why taking someone from an injured state to get healthier is so hard. I expected as much, but right now I'm feeling like I have a stack more to read and watch.
More suggestions are definitely welcome!
I'm going to read some more about glute activation, abs and stability/core work and hammys :) |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
ozzyaaron
Level 0
Join date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 207
|
|
Maybe I'll stick with what I've got, minus the last exercise. As you said, rehab is where it's at so getting a good workout with exercises that aren't going to aggravate the lower back (everything minus the DB Swings) and then the rest of the time spent on rehab type stuff.
I've been scouring Mike Robertson, Eric Cressey and Mike Boyle stuff about glute activation and real core exercises and have bookmarked the videos you sent BBB so I can watch them tonight. If I have any more questions (and you guys don't mind answering them) then I'll post here.
Thanks again heaps for your help guys, I will let you know how I go! |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
DragnCarry
Level 0
Join date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 696
|
|
bushidobadboy wrote:
Ignore Dragncarry; he is unfortunately assessing the rest of the world form his own, limited experience.
I wasn't assessing the rest of the world at all, thank you. I was talking about my own experiences.
I guess I did cross the line at times, so sorry. Obviously I have spent a lot of wasted time on exercises and treatments that were never going to do anything more than part me with my cash, or at best make me feel better for a short time.
That is certainly not to suggest that all experts are a waste of time and money, or that the path I took is the best path for everyone. I assume too much about the common-sense of others. |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
bushidobadboy
Level 4
Join date: Nov 2004
Location: Wales
Posts: 11805
|
|
DragnCarry wrote:
bushidobadboy wrote:
Ignore Dragncarry; he is unfortunately assessing the rest of the world form his own, limited experience.
I'm wasn't assessing the rest of the world at all, thank you.
No? So why did you write this:
"I think a lot of people have back pain simply because they are weak as piss"
BBB |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
DragnCarry
Level 0
Join date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 696
|
|
bushidobadboy wrote:
No? So why did you write this:
"I think a lot of people have back pain simply because they are weak as piss"
BBB
That I make no apology for. The only apology I make is for encouraging the OP to proceed without proper guidance.
If you have a different opinion, fine. We all have different backgrounds, yours I believe is in chiropractic? So if you were an exercise physiologist, would it be different?
|
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
DragnCarry
Level 0
Join date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 696
|
|
"Assessing the rest of the world" would be saying "everyone has back pain because of ... "
|
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
bushidobadboy
Level 4
Join date: Nov 2004
Location: Wales
Posts: 11805
|
|
DragnCarry wrote:
bushidobadboy wrote:
No? So why did you write this:
"I think a lot of people have back pain simply because they are weak as piss"
BBB
That I make no apology for. The only apology I make is for encouraging the OP to proceed without proper guidance.
If you have a different opinion, fine. We all have different backgrounds, yours I believe is in chiropractic? So if you were an exercise physiologist, would it be different?
What does exercise physiology have to do with back pain?
BBB |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
bushidobadboy
Level 4
Join date: Nov 2004
Location: Wales
Posts: 11805
|
|
DragnCarry wrote:
"Assessing the rest of the world" would be saying "everyone has back pain because of ... "
Instead you used the words "a lot of people", not "everyone". Sure there's a big difference, but the implication (that you personally know why a lot of people have back pain) is there.
I'm just very wary of making sweeping generalisations, about something as complex as the human body, especially the back. And that's after studying it for years. For you to come along and just dumb it down in the way that you did, seems irresponsible and foolish, sorry.
Of course you are right in that everybody has a different opinion. I will leave you to yours, good day.
BBB |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
conorh
Level 4
Join date: Sep 2004
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 2663
|
|
bushidobadboy wrote:
Ignore Dragncarry; he is unfortunately assessing the rest of the world form his own, limited experience.
You have NO IDEA what is causing her back pain. To go with the idea that "well she's probably weak as piss - do some glute activation work" is potentially a philosophy that could ensure your 'really good friend' becomes crippled in pain.
Whilst I admire your desire to help your friend, I STRONGLY urge you to proceed with caution.
Your plan: "I really want to get her doing complex movements and full body stuff, but also want to save her back" is going to be very hard to do unless you are some sort of back specialist with a strong knowledge in exercise technique/biomechanics/soft tissue work, etc.
she has a bad back so why not actually plan a workout that stresses all the major muscle groups, but without loading the lower back.
Then you can compliment the work done to the rest of the body, buy specifically isolating and strengthening/activating ALL those muscles that might have a part to play in her back pain.
So that would be (to start with): erector spinae, QLs, glutes (all three, bilaterally), piriformis, psoas, rec.fem, ITB, TFL, adductors, hamstrings, rec. abdominus, TVA, int. + ext. obliques.
All the above muscles need to be carefully assesses for length, strength, intra and inter-muscular co-ordination. Can you do that?
Some of the truly 'back sparing' exercises I could reccommend might be:
Chest supported row
Lat pulldowns (different grips)
Bench press
Seated shoulder press (not standing)
Seated dumbell raises
Split squats and lunges (pain permitting)
Again, I admire you desire you help your friend but please don't let your enthusiasm get in the way of 'duty of care'.
BBB
I've heard the reverse hyper criticized because of the reverse shear stress it imposes on the lumbar spine. Wouldn't the chest supported row be guilty of this as well? Not that I completely buy the premise that this is harmful, but I want to know what you think. Have you been on the boards lately, or have I just missed it?
-Conor
|
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
bushidobadboy
Level 4
Join date: Nov 2004
Location: Wales
Posts: 11805
|
|
conorh wrote:
I've heard the reverse hyper criticized because of the reverse shear stress it imposes on the lumbar spine. Wouldn't the chest supported row be guilty of this as well? Not that I completely buy the premise that this is harmful, but I want to know what you think. Have you been on the boards lately, or have I just missed it?
-Conor
I personally think the reverse hyper is a great exercise for glute activation - if done properly.
Anyway, you were asking about the chest supported row. I fail to see how this could cause any degree of lumbar shear stress, but then I do mine lying face down on what is essentially a long, wide, padded peiece of wood, raised off the ground.
I suppose the 'gym standard' CS row, if used with heavy weight, in which the subject tries to 'cheat' the weight up a bit by jerking their upper body off the pad, could indeed place shear stress in the LS.
Solution: Use appropriate technique. This exercise (to me, from a rehab perspective) is largely about scapular retraction, not humeral extention. If the 'assistant'/coach/partner, gently but firmly presses the subject into the chest pad, then this should take care of shear stress.
Good question ;)
BBB |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
Sportowiec
Level 0
Join date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 100
|
|
Bushidobadboy, is there anything I can do if I have one of the Quadratus Lumborum permamently more tense (stronger/shorter) then the other one? |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
bushidobadboy
Level 4
Join date: Nov 2004
Location: Wales
Posts: 11805
|
|
Sportowiec wrote:
Bushidobadboy, is there anything I can do if I have one of the Quadratus Lumborum permamently more tense (stronger/shorter) then the other one?
You can try and asses what might be causing it.
My bet would be either a leg length discrepancy or weak/inhibited glute med and min on the opposite side, or perhaps some postural thing. Do you have a wallet which you wear in one specific back pocket whilst you drive or sit?
BBB |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |