|
|
|
|
musclegym
Level 1
Join date: Mar 2009
Location:
Posts: 126
|
Alex Stoddard wrote:
musclegym wrote:
Sorry about all the run on sentences and misspellings.....
You're forgiven, now apologize for starting a post with ....
musclegym wrote:
CNN did a report that said .....
Sorry about that. It was pathetic. |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
Chris Shugart
Editor / V-Diet Author
Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 8977
|
|
Pushharder, what about the study I linked in the article about lowered T levels? Not enough of a deterrent?
Honestly, I think we could give you a dozen negative milk studies, but since you like milk and don't want to be wrong about it, they won't change your mind. And if you've been able to consume milk and build the exact body you want, then good for you. If not, then at some point you have to ask yourself if milk could be one of the things holding you back, slowing progress, etc.
If you're muscular and 5% body fat while drinking milk, I won't argue with you. If you're soft and kinda bloated most of the year, well, you gotta ask if milk is working.
Better yet, ask "Is it helping?" Because there's a difference between something "probably not hurting me" and "definitely helping me." If the T level study is true, then I can't see how any weight-training male can say his milk usage is "helping."
Now if you just say, "I like milk, it's yummy, and I'm too broke to buy protein supplements" that's fine too. Just say it and stop asking for more and more studies. (Not aiming that at you personally, push, but I see that reaction a lot.)
For me, cutting out milk was one of the big factors that's helped me get lean and stay lean, where before it seemed I was always stuck at the "not fat, but kinda soft" stage. It wasn't about studies, allergens, or hormones. It was about dropping milk and immediately not having to struggle so much with excess fat gain. Case closed... for me. As someone referenced above, you have to ask: Is it REALLY working... for YOU?
http://tnation.tmuscle.com/...working_for_you
|
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
TNfit
Level 0
Join date: Feb 2009
Location:
Posts: 17
|
Heracles_rocks wrote:
Chris is right push, milk is bad for you. Definitely not poisonous, but having too many female pregnancy hormones involved could be considered evil for guys at least.
I did a little research and found that milk has progesterone(main hormone during pregnancy)
http://www.news.harvard.edu/...7/11-dairy.html
The article really doesn't prove any ill effects from the hormones, only that more research is needed. If you drink skim milk like I do you don't have to worry about the hormones since they are skimmed out with the fat.
BTW, I have seen numerous posters including Chris say that lactose is an "inferior" carbohydrate, apparently without any scientific proof. I doubt that is true since studies have shown that in the post recovery period, where carbohydrates are most important, milk is as good or better than most (if not all) recovery drinks and powders out there.
|
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
pushharder
Level 4
Join date: Apr 2005
Location: Montana, USA
Posts: 18636
|
|
Chris Shugart wrote:
Pushharder, what about the study I linked in the article about lowered T levels? Not enough of a deterrent?
Honestly, I think we could give you a dozen negative milk studies, but since you like milk and don't want to be wrong about it, they won't change your mind.e
There's where you're wrong. There's where you were sitting in the bar drinking Mai-Tais and the boat left the dock without you on board.
I like the taste of milk but can take it or leave it. I've gone months at a time without drinking a drop. I don't have to have it and don't want to be "wrong" about it and my mind can be easily changed if warranted.
So give me a "dozen milk studies" that show milk is toxic. You said you could so DO it. YOU can be the guy that hits the home run and then YOU can have the glory. Cite the studies that show that lactose is a bad sugar for those who tolerate it well.
And don't say something to the effect that all sugars are basically bad because there are several Biotest products that contain them and consumption of sugars IS appropriate in certain instances for hard training athletes.
If one's ultimate goal is to get lean then yes, leave milk out of your diet. I agree with that wholeheartedly and have successfully employed that tactic in the past when that was my goal. But don't be so myopic as to believe that every person reading these words is trying to get lean.
And if you've been able to consume milk and build the exact body you want, then good for you.
Illogical thinking. Very few of us have "built the exact body" we want. If we were consuming Metabolic Drive in copious amounts and no milk but hadn't achieved "exactness" does that mean MD should be booted? Of course not.
If not, then at some point you have to ask yourself if milk could be one of the things holding you back, slowing progress, etc.
Agreed.
If you're muscular and 5% body fat while drinking milk,
A year round 5% body fat goal is a ridiculous one for 98% of the people reading this. You're trying to argue a point using futile extremes as a basis.
I won't argue with you. If you're soft and kinda bloated most of the year, well, you gotta ask if milk is working.
No, you WILL argue with me. You wrote the fuckin article and you think someone's casting aspersions about you if they don't necessarily take it as gospel.
I just don't want this milk thing to be the equivalent of man-made global warming, where mantras are chanted like monks on a German hilltop, "We all know man-made global warming is a FACT, don't we brother? Anyone who differs is a simpleton."
Better yet, ask "Is it helping?" Because there's a difference between something "probably not hurting me" and "definitely helping me." If the T level study is true, then I can't see how any weight-training male can say his milk usage is "helping."
Agreed. But there is a difference between that ^^ and "milk is toxic."
Now if you just say, "I like milk, it's yummy, and I'm too broke to buy protein supplements" that's fine too. Just say it and stop asking for more and more studies. (Not aiming that at you personally, push, but I see that reaction a lot.)
FTR, you CAN"T aim it at me. I buy lots and lots of Biotest protein powder.
For me, cutting out milk was one of the big factors that's helped me get lean and stay lean, where before it seemed I was always stuck at the "not fat, but kinda soft" stage. It wasn't about studies, allergens, or hormones. It was about dropping milk and immediately not having to struggle so much with excess fat gain. Case closed... for me. As someone referenced above, you have to ask: Is it REALLY working... for YOU?
Now we've gotten to the crux of the matter. I agree with all of the above paragraph.
It's not really about the alleged toxicity of milk but whether the inclusion of it in your diet, or not, will help you pursue YOUR GOALS. Savvy?
|
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
Chris Shugart
Editor / V-Diet Author
Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 8977
|
|
Push, I'm hard at work on some other stuff now, so this is a closed topic for me. Just let me remind you of something you already quoted from the article. The whole "toxic" statement I made - it ended with a question mark. Look at it. I wrote a sentence representing both sides. The "toxic" one represented one extreme. Please note the punctuation.
And it all comes down to this: If dropping milk worked great for me, several studies have shown it to be less than ideal for a variety of reasons, and every physique-conscious nutrition expert I trust says to avoid milk... well, I'm going to do it. And I'm going to pass along that info to my readers. You do what you want with it.
What you won't do is DEMAND that I argue with you. |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
pushharder
Level 4
Join date: Apr 2005
Location: Montana, USA
Posts: 18636
|
|
For those who may be shaking their heads and mumbling, "Push, Push, Push, why are you beating the living shit outta this horse," here's my answer:
For precisely the main reason that Chris advocates eliminating milk from one's diet, i.e., it'll help you get leaner, I'm suggesting milk can help (yes, "help" as in the opposite of "hurt" and "bad" and "toxic") an already lean person add weight. In fact, in my personal experience no other food or food supplement is better for weight gain.
Believe it or not, weight gain, and NOT weight loss, is the goal of many who visit this site. There are other ways to add cals to one's diet in simple innocuous ways, e.g., olive oil shooters and such as mentioned by Chris and others, but for the scrawny, hard-working, hard-lifting guy who has difficulty getting in enough cals in any given day and is desperately trying to gain weight, nothing in my personal opinion works better than guzzling whole milk, preferably spiked with heavy cream.
NOW if indeed milk is actually toxic or "baaaaaad" then I would have to say, like the others, stay away from it in all instances - you don't want to do something akin to inhaling asbestos, do you?
That's why I was earnestly looking for objective sources/studies that insisted that milk for the lactose tolerant was still somewhat poisonous. I'm not here to defend milk, I'm here to root out the "Well, shucks, everybody that's anybody KNOWS that man made global warming is a FACT and you are so passe if you aren't riding the train to utopia with us" crowd.
* I will concede that if the study cited regarding hormones in commercial milk is indeed valid that it should be good evidence that milk is undesirable. However, it IS one (1) study and it was conducted in Japan. I would think corroborating studies would be in order to establish firmer conclusions. Also, since I and 99.9% of the people reading this article don't consume Japanese cow's milk I'd like to see studies using American milk in their experiments. |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
pushharder
Level 4
Join date: Apr 2005
Location: Montana, USA
Posts: 18636
|
|
Chris Shugart wrote:
...What you won't do is DEMAND that I argue with you.
You misunderstood because I didn't express my thought clearly, I guess. I didn't DEMAND you argue with me. I intended it to say "You ARE arguing with me." Sorry.
If we had been talking face to face the inflection in my voice would've communicated my intended thought. |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
Alex Stoddard
Level 3
Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 70
|
|
pushharder wrote:
In fact, in my personal experience no other food or food supplement is better for weight gain.
Believe it or not, weight gain, and NOT weight loss, is the goal of many who visit this site. There are other ways to add cals to one's diet in simple innocuous ways, e.g., olive oil shooters and such as mentioned by Chris and others, but for the scrawny, hard-working, hard-lifting guy who has difficulty getting in enough cals in any given day and is desperately trying to gain weight, nothing in my personal opinion works better than guzzling whole milk, preferably spiked with heavy cream.
No arguments here. For ectomorphs (like myself) with no milk issues, put it to ya!
pushharder wrote:
* I will concede that if the study cited regarding hormones in commercial milk is indeed valid that it should be good evidence that milk is undesirable. However, it IS one (1) study and it was conducted in Japan. I would think corroborating studies would be in order to establish firmer conclusions. Also, since I and 99.9% of the people reading this article don't consume Japanese cow's milk I'd like to see studies using American milk in their experiments.
Check out "The World According to Monsanto". They show data on studies done on rBGH that showed some rather undesirable effects that they played down to being nothing of concern, even though one of the chief examiners stated that these things were undesirable. Not 100% sure on the issue, but it was a type of immune response that didn't happen from untreated cows milk!
|
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
Chushin
Level 5
Join date: Feb 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 1948
|
|
pushharder wrote:
Also, since I and 99.9% of the people reading this article don't consume Japanese cow's milk I'd like to see studies using American milk in their experiments.
What? No loving concern for me, Push? :-) |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
Icarus
Level 4
Join date: Feb 2003
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 261
|
LiquidMercury wrote:
So, as a side note from all the hooplah about careers, milk, and other various discussions going on here, how's the bread and the cheesecake? Anyone tried them yet? I just bought the ingredients for both and will be trying them out tomorrow.
Also it took me forever to find almond flour but in my search I did find coconut flour which also seemed to be not too bad, though someone could probably be more definitive on that. I assume since it's not coming from a grain, it could possibly be used instead (cheaper and possible different texture/taste)
http://www.amazon.com/...nutrition-facts
Thoughts?
The bread is really good. I replaced 1/2 cup of the Almond Flour with 1/2 cup of milled flaxseed. Worked fine. Made a whole loaf and eat a slice with my greek yogurt mixed with strawberry Metabolic Drive for a snack.
Here is the nutritional info for 1 loaf (with the 1/2 cup flax seed) so you can divvy it up however you need to to meet whatever your macro count needs to be.
Calories 1988
Fat 181g
Sat Fat 72g
PolyU Fat 35g
MonoU Fat 74g
Carbs 53g
Fiber 26g
Protein 65g |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
pushharder
Level 4
Join date: Apr 2005
Location: Montana, USA
Posts: 18636
|
|

Chushin wrote:
pushharder wrote:
Also, since I and 99.9% of the people reading this article don't consume Japanese cow's milk I'd like to see studies using American milk in their experiments.
What? No loving concern for me, Push? :-)
Being .1% makes you so special... |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
LiquidMercury
Level 4
Join date: Mar 2007
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 699
|
Icarus wrote:
LiquidMercury wrote:
So, as a side note from all the hooplah about careers, milk, and other various discussions going on here, how's the bread and the cheesecake? Anyone tried them yet? I just bought the ingredients for both and will be trying them out tomorrow.
Also it took me forever to find almond flour but in my search I did find coconut flour which also seemed to be not too bad, though someone could probably be more definitive on that. I assume since it's not coming from a grain, it could possibly be used instead (cheaper and possible different texture/taste)
http://www.amazon.com/...nutrition-facts
Thoughts?
The bread is really good. I replaced 1/2 cup of the Almond Flour with 1/2 cup of milled flaxseed. Worked fine. Made a whole loaf and eat a slice with my greek yogurt mixed with strawberry Metabolic Drive for a snack.
Here is the nutritional info for 1 loaf (with the 1/2 cup flax seed) so you can divvy it up however you need to to meet whatever your macro count needs to be.
Calories 1988
Fat 181g
Sat Fat 72g
PolyU Fat 35g
MonoU Fat 74g
Carbs 53g
Fiber 26g
Protein 65g
I tried the loaf the other day and it had a baking soda taste to it and you could taste the coconut oil. It didn't taste bad per say, but not as good as it smelled. I'm going to go down to 1 tsp of baking soda instead of a tbsp and I'm going to up the splenda I put in for a bit sweeter bread as well as an increased amount of cinnamon and I'll add some nutmeg in. For the record, the batter by itself tasted awesome (I mean who doesn't lick the spoon/bowl after?) so I'm just going to play around with oven settings and the above changes to see how it goes. Also considering adding in blueberries. I'll let people know how it turns out. |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
Bunyip
Level 0
Join date: Aug 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 167
|
Jade1 wrote:
mcook123 wrote:
SirenSong61 wrote:
What can I tell you, I wasn't raised on a farm. I'll bet nobody answers this but I'm going to ask because I'm hopeful and I've always wondered: Don't cows HAVE to be milked? What happens if they aren't?
Also, about nuts: I'd read that nuts go rancid really fast if they're not kept refrigerated (Tosca Reno, I think). Yet nuts aren't refrigerated at the grocery store, where they could sit forever if they're not bought. What's the truth?
Clearly, I have no fear of appearing stupid when I want to know ;).
They have to be milked if you want them to keep producing milk. If you don't milk them they will stop producing milk sooner and what is left will start to leak out. As the nuts, I don't know but I was introduced to the concepts of serving nuts on ice in Dubai and absolutely love it.
This is not 100% true (a common misconception- one I held until about two months ago). Cows will only produce milk for about a year/14months after each pregnancy (being continuously milked- if you stop milking, they will stop producing in that year). (EDIT: to be clear, some cows are genetically inclined to keep producing milk for several years after having a baby, however, the milk production declines so much that it's not acceptable/economical for typical factory farms. And again mammary gland infection can be a problem from continuously milking) So... to meet today's standards of milk production in typical factory farms (quotas) cows are impregnated once per year and they get about "two months off" when they are dried-off (helps prevent diseases/conditions that infect the teets if cows are continously milked - mastitis-... which is common with milk cows, hence all the antibiotics). Once they give birth the calf is taken away within 24 hours so humans can consume the milk. The male calf is either killed right away or kept in a small crate for 6-12 weeks to produce soft veal. (They are fed milk replacers). Female calfs are kept to replace the mother milk cows. Cows produce less and less milk each year (according to factory farm standards) and are killed for beef in about 5 years. Horomones are given to cows to increase milk production and are not necessary. Now if you happened to live on a farm and had a 'family cow' she could produce 10 litres a day- without hormomes- which is more than enough to provide for a family and nurse a calf at the same time.
I've been an avid milk drinker since I was born and love milk, but since learning how milk is really made for our grocery stores, I've drastically reduced my intake. I haven't cut it out completely (i.e. cheese, yogurt) but have sourced local farms and tried different kinds of milk products (i.e. goat milk- goats are only pregnant once per 2 years and then tend to be raised on small family farms- in my area anyway). As a side effect to my "moral dilemma" I actually feel 100x better than when I consumed milk. Cutting it back has made me realize how it was negatively affecting me (i.e. bloating, digestive issues, mucus, skin issues-eczema... extra fat- keeping my diet the same except removing most milk products has increased my fat loss while I'm still performing well in the gym), so from my experience I can see why there are people advocating not drinking milk for health reasons. While I still love the taste and convenience of milk... I've personally found there are so many other foods that have higher amounts of calcium and better quality protiens.
Good post. What are these other foods that you have found which have higher amounts of calcium and better protein? |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
This thread is no longer open to replies. Click HERE to start a new topic.
|