|
|
|
|
jarED1708
Level 1
Join date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 6
|
|

1st post,avid T-Nation reader.
Been lifting for two years now,no supplements, picture below is when I first started.
Started with just bicep curls and flat bench and instantly loved it, only about a year ago I began to get serious about training and began to understand the science behind everything,and the importance of the squat and deadlift.
stats for when I first started:
Height- 5 foot 10 inch
Weight- 120 pounds
arms- 11 inches
Max:
curl- about 60
bench- 100
squat- 135
deadlift- 135
overhead press- 80
|
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
jarED1708
Level 1
Join date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 6
|
|

Current stats:
Height- 6 foot
Weight- 170 pounds
arms- 15 inch
Max:
curl: 135
bench: 260
squat: 370
deadlift: 400(only have 400 at my home gym)
overhead press: 170
|
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
CornSprint
Level 3
Join date: May 2009
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 187
|
|
Despite the fact that I think it's obvious and you're fishing for compliments:
Absolutely! Looks like you've done a great job so far, keep it up. What are your goals and what are you looking to weigh in at eventually?
Bonus points for the Norma Jean poster and your pants now only being 1/8 way down your ass instead of 1/2 :-p
Throw in some pics of the wheels, although by your squat and dead numbers, they ought to be at least respectable. |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
JaX Un
Level 1
Join date: Aug 2008
Location: California, USA
Posts: 779
|
|
yup i find the lifts hard to believe but that second picture is extremely shitty and out of focus |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
jarED1708
Level 1
Join date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 6
|
|
I just started to get involved with the whole picture/video thing and interacting in the forums, ill try and get some videos of my lifts up.
I want to stay under 200 pounds and move some good weight.
goals are to bench 300 by the end of summer and have my six pack show through, thinking about buying some creatine. |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
thr_wedge
Level 0
Join date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 265
|
|
You also grew 2 inches in that time frame so you damn well have better put on some serious weight as well.
Why do you want to stay under 200lbs? |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
Fuzzyapple
Level 3
Join date: Nov 2008
Location:
Posts: 2461
|
|
Your the first person to write their max down for curls I think. But overall good work. |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
nik133
Level 0
Join date: May 2009
Location:
Posts: 471
|
|
Just curious as to whether those are your max out numbers? Great job overall! |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
patricio2626
Level 0
Join date: Dec 2008
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 498
|
|
Hmm, curl = 135, with 15" arms??? I hate to be a doubter, but that's a lot of weight; I can barely curl that! Is that a strict lift? |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
jarED1708
Level 1
Join date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 6
|
|
yes I am obviously emo, because when I was sixteen I had long hair, as most people who are in their teen years do.
and apparently I did get a haircut seeing as how I don't have long hair anymore, you people on here can be so ignorant sometimes, I posted this so I could talk about lifting weights and progression not argue with asinine individuals.
on a different, and smarter, note I would like to stay under 200 and still be able to move decent weight so my strength percentage is higher.
also 135 is not strict, very sloppy, i can curl 115 with near perfect form tho. |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
nz6stringaxe
Level 0
Join date: Mar 2008
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 499
|
|
I'm having a hard time believing that 400lb DL with that back.
Whenever I think about this, I think of Eric Cressey because he can pull some shit, but he's not very big at 178 if I recall. |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
jarED1708
Level 1
Join date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 6
|
|
well i guess im just a huge fucking liar then, even tho i have friends in football the same size as me squating 500 and benching over 300, i dont really give a fuck that all you people dont believe me because i KNOW what i can and cant do, you dont believe because you dont want to believe because im probably stronger than you, its ok im gonna get that.
end. |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
patricio2626
Level 0
Join date: Dec 2008
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 498
|
|
A 115 curl is much more believable than 135, yes. As far as your DL and bench goes, I'm going to take your word for them. DL really varies; some people just seem to have the mechanics for it, and a 260 bench is not astronomical, so I wouldn't say for sure you couldn't do it. |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
dmunro
Level 2
Join date: May 2008
Location: Manitoba, CAN
Posts: 157
|
|
jarED1708 wrote:
well i guess im just a huge fucking liar then, even tho i have friends in football the same size as me squating 500 and benching over 300, i dont really give a fuck that all you people dont believe me because i KNOW what i can and cant do, you dont believe because you dont want to believe because im probably stronger than you, its ok im gonna get that.
end.
That hissy fit just threw all your credibility out the window. You should have just taken the criticism with some class, kid.
|
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
countingbeans
Level 2
Join date: Oct 2008
Location:
Posts: 4735
|
|
jarED1708 wrote:
well i guess im just a huge fucking liar then, even tho i have friends in football the same size as me squating 500 and benching over 300, i dont really give a fuck that all you people dont believe me because i KNOW what i can and cant do, you dont believe because you dont want to believe because im probably stronger than you, its ok im gonna get that.
end.
You have made progress, keep at it.
I would expect visible erectors and traps at that bodyfat if you pulled 405 on a regular basis though. Could be a bad photo though?
|
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
Thors Spammer
Level 0
Join date: Jun 2009
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 57
|
|
I find the 400 pound dead hard to believe not because of the back but because of the forearm size. That's a lot of weight to be holding on to with such small forearms... |
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
krsoneeeee
Level 0
Join date: Jul 2009
Location:
Posts: 21
|
|
countingbeans wrote:
I would expect visible erectors and traps at that bodyfat if you pulled 405 on a regular basis though. Could be a bad photo though?
if he's got good technique but most ppl dont shrug properly at the top of the lift.
look heaps healthier than first photo bro... more traps/back/forearms exercises would be good
|
|
| Report Post |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |